6 + 2 Point Deductions

[formerly manx toffee]

Does this not mean Newcastle can get some Saudi sponsors to up thiet revenu and spend accordingly?

Not if it is at an “inflated” value

 

[Dymak]

Anyone have a link explaining exactly how these new rules work? I don’t see how it can be on a year-by-year basis when players are on contracts lasting 3, 4, or 5 years.

Everton’s revenues for the next accounting period are going to be sky high if we stay in the league and we sell Branthwaite and Onana for serious cash. Technically, this should therefore allow us to spend, but we aren’t going to have the same revenues the following season. So how does that work?

 

[Ruairi77]

I like Neville's idea of each club being capped at 85% of the revinue of the most profitable club.
Not sure if there are other suitors besides 777 now, but if this was the case, there'd be lots of interest.

 

[Dixieslaces]

We dont have "this" years accounts.

Last published accounts our revenue was 181million and our wage bill was 163million.

89.5% wages to revenue.

Everton 2021/22 accounts, analysis part I

First things first, the publication of the annual report and accounts has been left to the last business hour of the last possible day within statutory limits. This, in conjunction with no general …

theesk.org

Didn't it reach over 95% at one point.

 

[Goat]

Anyone have a link explaining exactly how these new rules work? I don’t see how it can be on a year-by-year basis when players are on contracts lasting 3, 4, or 5 years.

Everton’s revenues for the next accounting period are going to be sky high if we stay in the league and we sell Branthwaite and Onana for serious cash. Technically, this should therefore allow us to spend, but we aren’t going to have the same revenues the following season. So how does that work?

I ASSUME when we sell Onana and Branners the money from their sale will be added to our revenue.

 

[Walken]

We get hit twice, forest one and everyone else dodges it, of course

 

[Goat]

Didn't it reach over 95% at one point.

96% seems the highest.

 

[Dixieslaces]

96% seems the highest.

Insanity.

 

[formerly manx toffee]

96% seems the highest.

Hahaa. We are the worst position of all teams in the league !!

 

[Tin-Tin]

Only benefit we could have for rules changing this summer is clubs wont liwball us for Branthwaite and Onana on the 29th June, knowing we have to sell one. Which by all accounts if the rules stayed in place, we would have to.

 

[Goat]

Hahaa. We are the worst position of all teams in the league !!

2nd "best" club in the world actually mate.

 

[formerly manx toffee]

At least it seems to take away spending on infrastructure - stadium, training ground etc

 

[Dymak]

I ASSUME when we sell Onana and Branners the money from their sale will be added to our revenue.

It will. But what I’m asking is how can you budget for a player’s wages on a four year contract, when revenues can fluctuate so wildly from year to year?

You can afford him this year, but how do you know if you can still afford him in three or four years time?

 

[Nymzee]

96% seems the highest.

I suspect we're in a much better position this Summer let alone now.

 

[Goat]

It will. But what I’m asking is how can you budget for a player’s wages on a four year contract, when revenues can fluctuate so wildly from year to year?

You can afford him this year, but how do you know if you can still afford him in three or four years time?

At MOST clubs revenues increase year on year.

But then Everton isnt most clubs.

Ive briefly glanced at the new rules, so I cant fully answer your questions.