So it's not about sustainability then.. more about the 6 being able to harvest other sides best players on the cheap because compliance must be adhered to..... we may see that we need 30 million to comply this June.. oh oh here comes Liverpool...
This gets right to the question of what the rules are there for.
If they’re there to make clubs ‘sustainable’, then getting an extra £17m by waiting 9 weeks should be allowed (for Johnson, and for Richarlison too)
if the rules are for some...
I don't think so, if they can prove that they got more by holding on then isn't that better as far as sustainability goes? Or do the PL want teams to sell for less by a certain date, if this is the case then the rules are even more of a joke than...
Funny that you'd have taught the opposite should have happened, I genuinely watched more non Everton games that season than I had done for a long time and I haven't watched many non Everton games since...
I think fans are usually short sighted about these things.
Does it affect us now?.... then I don't care.
Does it hurt other teams ?.... Great, bring it on.
What fans may not comprehend if that what is happening at present will completely limit...
If they take anything we should be appealing.. also based on forest getting a smaller punishment for a bigger breach we should be looking into a second appeal of the first punishment and if it's not granted bring it to an actual court...
We had better not, in fact in light of the Forest decision to be given a lesser punishment for a bigger loss I'd be looking into getting more points off the first punishment, go through proper courts if we must.