bag a yoko
Player Valuation: £10m
The Premier League stated their a private members club.
They what possible fine can they give a team in the Championship?
They what possible fine can they give a team in the Championship?
I think it was most people's feeling.
HalfTimeSayers
Player Valuation: £25m
Nah. If our 23 losses were going the wrong way, they wouldn’t have ignored them. They’d have said we’ve clearly abandoned attempts to ensure future compliance, and given us less points back.
You have seen an upturn in profitability if you have reduced your losses.
To be fair we bought Onana, Garner, Maupay and McNeill for £66 million in 22/23.
But still were 20 million in profit transfer-wise.
Rollo Tomassi
Player Valuation: £15m
This ridiculous desire to get the hearings rushed through for this season leaves it open to further recriminations. As only us and Forest have admitted to breaching and had to submit the most recent accounts by the end of the year but what if other clubs are found to have been in breach but the league only discover it when they submit their accounts later.
So for example Chelsea have breached and should have a hearing before the end of the season but because they have not submitted the figures in time they don't get punished until the following season.
Every club should have to report their latest accounts by the deadline not just the ones who think they've gone over.
So for example Chelsea have breached and should have a hearing before the end of the season but because they have not submitted the figures in time they don't get punished until the following season.
Every club should have to report their latest accounts by the deadline not just the ones who think they've gone over.
You were right.
I think they all do now. Around xmas wasnt it?
Surely they won't do it twice in the same season? Oh, wait....
GoldenToffee
Player Valuation: £50m
Davideeyore
Player Valuation: £25m
I just read that - from the above
That reinforces that we have been hard done by.
No mitigation. Laughable.
The first and 2nd sentences are diametrically opposed
First sentence ... they are saying the Commission gave us credit for the positive trend in PSR figures.
Second sentence ....the Commission didn't take into account ( punish us ) for an "upturn" ( increase in the losses ) in Y23.
Had they meant that the Y23 figures were even better ( and showed a smaller loss) they would have said that the commission gave us credit for the continuing trend of diminishing losses.
The Blue Watch
Player Valuation: £10m
The problem is that the average fan is a supporter of the scab six (= thick and entitled), or of one of the other clubs who would benefit from our demise.
I wouldn’t like to see Forest (or any other club) get any points deducted for this, if it wasn’t for the fact that their fans are behaving like they have some sort of moral high ground over us.
At the end of the day it’s only the ones at the top that get preferential treatment and stand to gain from these rules existing in the first place. Yet the fans of other clubs aren’t united, there isn’t any empathy towards us, and there won’t ever be because unfortunately for us we will be the only set of fans and the only club to ever be in this position.
So I agree, sod them all. Forest had just come up and had to overspend to have a chance at competing? Boo hoo, off to the championship. Southampton sold half their team to the RS and couldn’t keep up and the system isn’t fair? Unlucky. Leicester are tories and beyond saving? Yep. Crabs in a bucket while the ones at the top feast on us.
SwedishToffee
Player Valuation: £100k
Ring master
Player Valuation: £90m
Xmas is what it did seem like for all. But then it came out that any who thought they may have a problem had to submit by 31st December and others by March the 1st. Not sure what they stuck to
