Search results for query: *

Maguire wont be happening, we need cash. Wouldn't be surprised to see Kalvin Phillips on loan.

Delighted for Nathan Broadhead, getting promotion yesterday, a player i aways liked good to see him dong well for himself.

Sure no one ever thought of that Keith. FFS. Why not 20 years. Clickbait.

Overall 777 are toast lids. No one is lending them money now and they don’t have any so they can take us over. Only a matter time now it seems to me until Moshiri or they pull the plug.

Its an interesting one for sure mate, one of the things i think we can all be guilty of (not saying you) is holding Dyche to serotypes or perceived judgements based on those stereotypes - he does like maximum effort players who support the shape. However he is also a manager who breaks his own...

Ive watched him a fair bit mate and seen the same. Thats my doubt also - im not sure Dyche would go for him as he asks everyone to put in a shift and you have to carry Barkley to a degree. Pragmatically id have him back, purely on finance and we absolutely need a player with his creative...

Court Papers:

Presuming they didnt have operational control. We'd just be an investment really, so if they were to say go to the wall or anything else, the shareholding would be sold off - unless the club was involved with something with them - which would be unlikely if we had a legitimate majority...

Barkley i suspect looks better with a one year contract, rather then a three year one. Generally id be against on principal, but im a pragmatist ultimately, he would add some guile and creativity in transition and we need a player who can stand on the ball and control the game and tempo - so...

15th isnt it - i thought it was a curious date to pick at the time, i wondered about deadlines.

They wouldn't have operational control really mate, nor be able to leverage on the club. Be like Robert Earl back in the day. Shareholding can be weird though i think Bill held a majority with something just over 30% in the club - not far off anyway.

You will get posts often on here saying he was led astray etc and feeds into that victim narrative mate. Its not just the sale. Its his ownership and the impact on the club. The sale is another extension of it. Undoubtedly, lobby against the board saw their removal, undoubtedly protest and...

Anything below a 30% stake doesn't have to pass the fit and proper person test mate.

We will sell players mate, the plan has been to get to the window. If he can do a deal over the summer - with an alternative SUITABLE buyer all well and good. I trust not his competency or intentions. We need to stop blaming anyone not relevant im my opinion, its Moshiri its always been...

Ive said it before, the relegation battle, points deduction and all that has happened around the club since - the start of the season has been PR Mana for Moshiri and this corwd, in fact they cultivated it, a common enemy be it the PL, Sky, past board has been created to take the ire and...

That's actually a turn of events if true, be interesting to see the specifics of the case - they mention Wander individually. I think I'm right in saying you cant be become an owner of a Premier League Club if you have a criminal conviction.

Wouldn't be giving Spitty the legitimacy of replying to him. Id like a lobby from our fans toward Sky Sports for proper Everton representation, air lifted and wrenched into all the narrative and games around us - just because hes from Merseyside - hes nothing to do with this club.

Mick Lyons’s testimonial.