Search results for query: *

Of course. But any transfer is now about making the books look good first. They will be looking at similar deals in the summer. Beto and Chermitti will no doubt be paid over their contracts. So Beto for eg will be £6mill a year over 4 years or whatever has been agreed.

Could be wrong but either him or Beto we haven't paid anything installment wise this season for them.

We saying Hudson Odi is good now? And we went after Elanga instead but he turned us down (and looks at the agent fees Forest have paid). Could've got Barkley etc etc Simms and Canon were both deemed not good enough and sold rather than hanging on like we have in the past. As for...

Man has to buy players via Klarna as well as trying to shift players for profit that he can't use. It's almost an impossible ask (and we'd be on 35 points already)

It's the league who make the rules though...and they're not stopping it. People forget that they haven't got as far as they have if its a dead duck or breaking rules.

So 65% of £500mill then (Moshiri's asking price) which is £325mill. It doesn't seem like buying Moshiri out is the issue to the league, but turning their current loans into equity, something £30mill cashflow in a escrow, and evidence they can pay rest of the stadium.

65% leverage to the clubs value. Forbes value us at £700mill or even Moshiri's £500mill for his shares. Could be wrong but the league just want them to have genuine cash in an escrow and evidence the stadium is covered to be finished to give them the keys.

It's not against the prem rules. The league have never stopped owners taking over a club and indeed have let far more unsavoury characters than 777 in. The league is only worried about it's self and it's image, not the "integrity of the sport" or indeed any of the clubs that aren't the big...

The only thing we have asset wise is the new stadium. The stadium outside the PL isn't going to generate the value that Moshiri has put on it. It's in 777s interest to a) keep us in the PL and b) have controlling rights on the stadium. If they have both, they'll have a breadwinner for their...

Moshiri pumped £450mill of his dirty money into it and how loaned the rest as well as turning down the city councils investment. The equivalent is Spurs' stadium that took out £637million in loans from mainstream banks, at something like £30mill in interest per year (it's lower now). Plus...

Don't think that's the case. City, Forest, and West Ham don't own there's and rent/pay the council. Chelsea don't own there's. Council own the freehold on St James. Spurs is owned by them...and a percentage to some parent company in the Bahamas. I'm surprised some people think we'd fully own...

Knows how to wind up the bedwetters does Sir Messiah Sean

Dunno. And yes

Esk saying Blue Owl won't throw lend 777 the money because it doesn't fit their profile. ITS ON

Said the same a while ago. And if the fact MSP, Andy Bell etc are agreeing to an extension... surely they'd made some moves to put the brakes on this or allow another investor in by now.

That's the thing. His agenda is fuels the narrative. Mainstream press won't print his suggestions and alternatives that are so fantastical and damaging it damages his rep

Which came from stability and adding quality. Martinez showed what "modern" football was until he went full Martinez and removed the foundations. West Ham fans would rather be in the championship playing tiki taka than being a top 8 club.

Of course it'll be signed off. They'll make up something and say "in their view" it doesn't break any rules

Masters - "Well, we tried taking 17 points from Everton you know? We can control our ponies."

Apparently it's his worst defeat score wise of his managerial career. Another Everton first. Does say a lot about the squad IMO as it's a pattern for years that they've all got "one of them" in em