Search results for query: *

Loads of times. The ones I can remember: FA Cup Final 1989 Everton 1 Norwich 5 2-0 down to Wimbledon in 1994 The second leg against Villarreal in 2005

His miss from two inches out against Fulham could end up costing us hundreds of millions. He is an utter donkey, and the worst striker that I’ve ever seen play for Everton.

When is he due back? Any chance he could play against Forest?

‘Just to keep the lights on’. I wish people would stop with this dramatic BS.

I don't think we can completely out rule using the money gained from player sales to purchase new players that aren't out of contract or only available on loan. We bought Onana for over 30 million pound on the back of selling Richarlison just a couple of years ago, for example. The sales of...

I think he is that stupid tbh. It would be our gain if he did, but he will have his pick of clubs to choose from.

FA Cup Semi-Final at Elland Road 1995.

I don’t get the calls to sack Dyche in the event that we go down, as it will most definitely be the points deduction that would have caused our relegation, and more importantly, Dyche would be the number 1 candidate to get us out of the championship imo. Dyche in the PL however is a different...

I think it was Rooney.

This would require the agreement of at least 14 clubs.

The PL wouldn’t really be enforcing ‘old rules’ in such circumstances, they would be applying the relevant rules that were applicable to the three year accounting period up until the end of season 23/24. Like when a criminal is sentenced in correspondence with the law that was in place at the...

Possibly, but if Chelsea need to sell in the summer to prevent a breach, then the punishment that they are trying to prevent wouldn’t come until 2026. If they are heading for a breach in 2025 (as reported) then they need to sell just before the next accounting period, just before the summer. My...

If there is to be an incoming ‘clean slate’, then it will be ‘from now on’. The rules will still be applicable to the time period leading up to the clean slate, meaning yet more point deductions for clubs next season. I want the complete removal of these rules and a return to how things were...

If we stay up, I hope all the PL clubs vote to scrap these rules with immediate effect during the summer, so that there are no more charges, hearings, and appeals, and the whole thing is consigned to the dustbin with no further action taking place. I don’t care if it means City and Chelsea...

I don't agree with the rules or the points deductions. But I think we'd rather have two points deductions this season, rather than one last season and one this season. A total of 8 points deducted for two separate breaches kind of makes the punishments dished out to us and Forest even handed (4...

I don’t disagree with your arguments about fairness, and there has clearly been disparity in the application of punitive sanctions, which I think need to be corrected by the PL. But the prospect of a zero points deduction sounds fanciful imo, unless our second breach is relatively minor and the...

I don’t disagree, but the rest of the Premier League wouldn’t consider it fair if Everton received no points deduction for a second breach. I think two points is the best we can hope for, and it would get the PL out of any allegations of failing to apply points deductions fairly across clubs...

In my view, the EFL application of PSR rules seems to be used as precedent in the absence of any real precedent within the Premier League. The first IC were referencing Sheffield Wednesday etc. People are saying that the EFL have things in place to prevent ‘double jeopardy’, so it would be good...

Where does the supposed deadline of ‘mid-April’ come from then, if the companies house filings don’t include payment schedules for loans?

Why is the MSP payback date ambiguously referred to as mid-April? If the information has come from official documentation, then surely the official documentation being referred to is more specific than ‘mid April’?