Search results for query: *

Erm...

His commitment, until the war in Ukraine, can't be faulted. Almost literally every single decision he has made has been appalling, however. We are where we are because he's made some of the worst decisions in the history of football

We've been awful. Chelsea have been very good. Not seen us battered like this since the 0-5 against Spurs under Lampard. Nice of the lads to do it on Monday Night Football so the whole nation get to see it.

Chelsea (A) 0 Forest (H) 1 (and some proper flapping on here) Liverpool (H) 0 Brentford (H) 3 Luton (A) 1 Sheff Utd (H) 3 Arsenal (A) 0 35 points, which should be enough to keep us up

It would be a loan I would guess - he's been on loan at Napoli this season and barely played

Turned 29 today actually I would suggest people temper their expectation levels about summer signings - we'll be selling anyone we can to keep the lights on unless there's a fundamental change in our situation in the next 3 months. That means Branthwaite, Onana and maybe even the likes of DCL...

On the points per game this season, Dyche's return would be about 43 points over the full season - it's just about acceptable in the context of all the problems we have He can't be blamed for points deductions, but that run of form from December to now has been abysmal and the promising...

Yes, pretty much. The Forest commission's adoption of a banding system has meant that even though their breach is nearly double Everton's first breach, they receive the same penalty (before mitigation) of 6 points. Is it fair? For all I know it's the fairest methodology of the 4 we've seen so...

They haven't labelled ours as higher tier breaches. Not picking on you, but it surprises me how much misinformation there is knocking about when the reports are there in public record for all 4 verdicts so far Ignore the 10 point verdict for a moment as it served only to eventually settle on...

End of the day, if Dyche keeps us up then for a number of reasons (our financial and ownership situations featuring highly amongst them) he won't be going anywhere. He's out of contract at the end of next season (at the point we move into Bramley Moore) and I'd say the best you could hope for...

It's better than being unlucky and not winning like we've seen happen a number of times this season, but that was utterly grim today.

Decent point. The staring XI was horrendous and the moment we went a goal down, you knew it was going to be a tough watch. Subs made a huge difference. Does he get credit for the changes or do we criticise the fact they didn't start? Don't know, but for the first time in a while that feels like...

He will have much better options than us. Liverpool linked with him for a start

Might have two mate

Yes

I'm sort of expecting 6 given the only thing which appears to have been accepted as genuine mitigation in the 3 hearings so far has been early admission and complete co-operation I'm also sort of concerned about whether our latest breach is going to be bigger than the original one

A couple of months ago I'd have probably disagreed, but I'm now more in your camp than not. It does make me wonder though that you're not willing to put a number on it because you don't want the possibility of being vaulted if he achieves/surpasses your number.

It isn't a fact mate. I could say "he doesn't set us up terribly" and then point to our defensive record as being evidence of this and our underperformance of xG making it just that we've been unlucky. I don't necessarily think that, but that there's an alternative take on it makes it...

If anyone can argue whether you're right or not, they're not facts mate. "He sets us up terribly" is not a fact, it's an opinion and is therefore by definition subjective. You wrote a lot there, but you fell back into being specific about games. Again, I find myself agreeing with a lot of what...

The thing I don't like mate is that it's all very woolly. All I can really make out is "should do better". Be specific. Put a number on it. How many points better than last season should he do? I don't particularly disagree with anything you've said, but where it falls down is the bits that...