bluemangroup
Player Valuation: £70m
Depends what you define as too much.I would hope a wrong sweeping generalizations as I was just bein flippant but I'm honestly beginning to wonder.
Even Miliband said they didn't borrow too much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends what you define as too much.I would hope a wrong sweeping generalizations as I was just bein flippant but I'm honestly beginning to wonder.
Even Miliband said they didn't borrow too much.
Anything that the state can provide can be provided privately. That argument doesn't work. What we're talking about his lifestyle choices like having kids out of marriage with men that can't or won't pay for them. That's not something universal we all benefit from like the NHS and is bad for society in many ways. I don't think it's appropriate the state pays for it.I hope someone reminds you of that when you are paralysied from a stroke or incapacitated from a virus etc. Or when you lose your job and can't afford to pay the bills. After all its just a game and losing is part of it.
Exactly. From what I recall the country were generally happy with the investment in schools and hospitals etc. Labour were on a roll. They kept being re-elected anyway. Even the Tories were backing the spending plans as they were so good for the country.Depends what you define as too much.
We shouldn't have had a deficit at all before the credit crunch hit since the economy was booming. That was the time to pay it down.Depends what you define as too much.
Anything that the state can provide can be provided privately. That argument doesn't work. What we're talking about his lifestyle choices like having kids out of marriage with men that can't or won't pay for them. That's not something universal we all benefit from like the NHS and is bad for society in many ways. I don't think it's appropriate the state pays for it.
And people became much more self interested and thought the world was taking the piss all of a sudden.Exactly. From what I recall the country were generally happy with the investment in schools and hospitals etc. Labour were on a roll. They kept being re-elected anyway. Even the Tories were backing the spending plans as they were so good for the country.
and then came a global recession.
Anything that the state can provide can be provided privately. That argument doesn't work. What we're talking about his lifestyle choices like having kids out of marriage with men that can't or won't pay for them. That's not something universal we all benefit from like the NHS and is bad for society in many ways. I don't think it's appropriate the state pays for it.
Or it was the time to invest heavily in infrastructure. the figures aren't the be all and end all.We shouldn't have had a deficit at all before the credit crunch hit since the economy was booming. That was the time to pay it down.
Hindsight is wonderful. Eveyone from all political persuasions thought it was the right time to invest in previously neglected infrastructure etc.We shouldn't have had a deficit at all before the credit crunch hit since the economy was booming. That was the time to pay it down.
Anything that the state can provide can be provided privately.
If you don't think we benefit from a functional society then that is a shame. You can't expect society to function properly by cutting at the bottom and giving at the top. If wealth was distributed in a more just ways then there would be far less issues. Dont make the mistake of thinking that the poor are the problem. Look at the other end.
The one parent family argument is a tricky one but at the end of the day it's the Child that would suffer. Deal with the causes, not the symptoms.
Unfortunately. The result being that foreigners in this country started to get the blame.And people became much more self interested and thought the world was taking the piss all of a sudden.
That nagging right wing thought in me is telling me that these children should be put in workhouses and the mothers sent off to magdalene asylums. I think @Adversus would agree with that.
Sorry are you seriously saying we should have gone on borrowing?
Until when exactly? What age are you, maybe it's because by the time we are bankrupt you'll be dead.
At some point rebalancing the books had to occur. The debt has been going up for decades to fund all those progressive policies. You might not think that's a big deal but to me who probably won't get a pension or people younger that are having a hard time getting work it is.
A position as ideologically extreme as all-out communism.