another 'striker' point

[SuitsBlue]

"suits is not seeing this right, if we bring someone in, then we can sell someone"

last time i checked we werent that flush, and giving the game away by admitting we have too many strikers means what? we dont have the upper hand at the transfer table.

"well, that cuts the other way, if we sell we have to replace"

do we?

we dont get anything like enough from beattie and mcfadden, jukewitz is the new lad, leaving us with aj cahill vaughan and anichebe.

"but we cant expect so few players to play so many games this coming season, with europe, the league and the cups"

ok, good point - you hand pick the games arteta doesnt play.

done.

 

[GhostOfDixie]

steady on the narcotics fella

 

[micknick]

Is it me or is there a bit of tension brewing???!

 

[GhostOfDixie]

Nope, that was just a little fun, because that thread opener is a little too weird for me.

 

[Gazdalf]

I believe the only time we should be looking to sign another striker is in the January transfer window and we can look at how many different competitions we are still in. Till then we have plenty to see us through.

 

[chicoazul]

He just called you gay.

 

[Axlswhk]

We have to buy a striker sooner or later, the best time is to get them at their cheapest. We have to get a replacement for BT and faddy sooner or later, if we can get nugent at the cheapest price available then why not?
I don't wish to see us scrambling or paying over the odds when we sold or release BT and faddy in the near future.