Booing

[NeilMorepies]

We are all aware of the argument often used by our fans that booing the team, or individual players after a poor performance is acceptable, because fans have paid their money and they therefore have a right to express their displeasure .
Does this apply to fans who haven’t paid to watch?

Does their lack of financial support nullify their right to be displeased?

I was wondering if that extends to GOT.
Do Forum Supporters have a right to boo posts they feel are of a substandard nature?
Should non-Forum Supporters refrain from booing other poster’s posts because they haven’t paid for the privilege?

As a non-Forum Supporter (for financial reasons), can I claim any rights to expressing my distain at another posters poor performance? Perhaps only the posts of another non-Forum Supporter?

(*I await a chorus of boos*)

 

[chrismpw]

Booing is never support.

I like to think there's only one utter trumpet amongst us that boos and the rest of the crowd realise this and boo the booer.

 

[Nymzee]

Booing is never support.

I like to think there's only one utter trumpet amongst us that boos and the rest of the crowd realise this and boo the booer.

What if the team is called Boo FC?

 

[NeilMorepies]

What if the team is called Boo FC?

Everton, putting the ‘ell into Boos FC

 

[matty1878]

only GOT would have a thread on this

 

[chrismpw]

What if the team is called Boo FC?

It's a good job our original city rivals and the second senior team in the city, Bootle, are no longer about.

 

[Nymzee]

It's a good job our original city rivals and the second senior team in the city, Bootle, are no longer about.

BOOOOOOOtle FC!

 

[Daytripper]

 

[john jako]

Booing is never support.

I like to think there's only one utter trumpet amongst us that boos and the rest of the crowd realise this and boo the booer.

When I used to go the game when down there I used to find booing weird. Not because I didn’t agree with it, it’s just a weird noise to make and gets you out of breath. It’s more hassle than it’s worth to your own physical state.

 

[Daveysgingerlovechild]

I constantly boo the content on here.

I'm doing it now. My wife thinks I'm nuts for booing at my phone.

She just doesn't get Everton.

 

[john jako]

I constantly boo the content on here.

I'm doing it now. My wife thinks I'm nuts for booing at my phone.

She just doesn't get Everton.

Yeh I sing sh1t thread no fans to certain threads on here

 

[Daveysgingerlovechild]

Yeh I sing sh1t thread no fans to certain threads on here

My threads, aren't they? You can say it. I can take it.

*pees pants*

 

[john jako]

My threads, aren't they? You can say it. I can take it.

*pees pants*

Nah I like your threads. There’s not many threads I don’t like. Sometimes the crap ones become the best Davey. Whoever thought a thread about a fridge would be so engaging.

 

[the sniderman]

We are all aware of the argument often used by our fans that booing the team, or individual players after a poor performance is acceptable, because fans have paid their money and they therefore have a right to express their displeasure .
Does this apply to fans who haven’t paid to watch?

Does their lack of financial support nullify their right to be displeased?

I was wondering if that extends to GOT.
Do Forum Supporters have a right to boo posts they feel are of a substandard nature?
Should non-Forum Supporters refrain from booing other poster’s posts because they haven’t paid for the privilege?

As a non-Forum Supporter (for financial reasons), can I claim any rights to expressing my distain at another posters poor performance? Perhaps only the posts of another non-Forum Supporter?

(*I await a chorus of boos*)

nice thread boozo.

 

[LEONARD]

I go for disgusted silence, got my first one in on Saturday.