VAR is a scam. That's what I'm going on about.
Was Lukaku offside yesterday?
I’m well aware VAR is a scam. But I saw a City player handle the ball and none of our players were offside in the build up, that is something I saw with my own eyes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
VAR is a scam. That's what I'm going on about.
Was Lukaku offside yesterday?
VAR decisions last weekend were incredible.VAR is a scam. That's what I'm going on about.
Was Lukaku offside yesterday?
I saw the handball. It was clear. I also saw Richarlison offside. You might be right on Richarlison or I might be...but nothing VAR offers will be accepted as proof of either as far as I'm concerned.I’m well aware VAR is a scam. But I saw a City player handle the ball and none of our players were offside in the build up, that is something I saw with my own eyes.
I saw the handball. It was clear. I also saw Richarlison offside. You might be right on Richarlison or I might be...but nothing VAR offers will be accepted as proof of either as far as I'm concerned.
It's a con.
No, because they'd decided their scam was based this time on a 'sleeve line' BS explanation.Hang on, why would VAR want to make him look onside? Wouldn’t they be fudging it so he was in an offside position to justify their own decision?
No, because they'd decided their scam was based this time on a 'sleeve line' BS explanation.
He wasn't though, IMO.Why though? If he was actually offside that’s the easiest way out for them isn’t it?
He wasn't though, IMO.
Please dont be throwing their line marking of the incident back to me...I reject their technology as the scam it is.
I'm so confused
But he's just said he wasnt offside above too. All over the show here.Dave thinks the images of Richarlison being clearly onside have been doctored to make him look onside by VAR because... erm, I don’t actually know.
No offense, but was he offside or wasn’t he? I thought you said he was, now you are saying he wasn’t? Which one is it? ?He wasn't though, IMO.
Please dont be throwing their line marking of the incident back to me...I reject their technology as the scam it is.
Yes, potentially it has , you muppet.it was very late in the game.Taylor calls for fans to have 'more understanding and empathy' towards referees
'More understanding and more empathy.'metro.co.uk
‘If one decision is wrong, that one decision, if we’re being brutally honest hasn’t cost the result.’
When quizzed on how he wants people to view referees, Taylor replied: ‘More understanding and more empathy.’
Detached from reality.
Taylor calls for fans to have 'more understanding and empathy' towards referees
'More understanding and more empathy.'metro.co.uk
‘If one decision is wrong, that one decision, if we’re being brutally honest hasn’t cost the result.’
When quizzed on how he wants people to view referees, Taylor replied: ‘More understanding and more empathy.’
Detached from reality.