I guess it depends on whether war was the only option. Considering the horrific death toll you'd like to think more efforts would have been made to avert it all in the first place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We all know war isw horrible and a waste of life except of course politicians, greedy presidents etc who do not give a [Poor language removed] for the ordinary person.
However if everyone had been a conscientuous objector we would now be speaking German, working as slave labour, etc etc.
Weidersehn!
Bruce go back to your history, in both the WWs, Germany started them. AS for WW2 Chamberlain did all he could to avert war but was crapped on by Hitler.
You are also forgetting the supposedly secret support that Germany gave to Franco.
As they say it takes two to tango.
With the 20th century being the bloodiest in mankinds history it doesn't appear to have been common sense to our political leaders. Or if it was they certainly didn't act upon it.
We all know war isw horrible and a waste of life except of course politicians, greedy presidents etc who do not give a [Poor language removed] for the ordinary person.
However if everyone had been a conscientuous objector we would now be speaking German, working as slave labour, etc etc.
Weidersehn!
wrong.
If everyone had been a conscientious objector there wouldn't have been a war.
because everyone on this forum wants to move to kirkby, and sign manny fernandes.
please think before making such outlandish statements as that. you have no idea how many people marched off to their deaths with nothing but their families safety in their minds - regardless of objection. show a bit of respect.
sorry its just pure logic. If everyone involved in WW2 had refused to take up arms, then it is not possible that a war could have happened.
at best a heated argument would have occurred.
therefore the statement is not outlandish.
show a bit of respect?
not everyone takes orders like a [Poor language removed] automaton you know.
sorry its just pure logic. If everyone involved in WW2 had refused to take up arms, then it is not possible that a war could have happened.
at best a heated argument would have occurred.
therefore the statement is not outlandish.
show a bit of respect?
not everyone takes orders like a [Poor language removed] automaton you know.
Deary me.
You do know the instigators to WWII?
WWII was inevitable.
It wasn't a case of refusal to take up arms.
yes I know. My point is that if all the germans, all the japanese all the russians, all the yanks, all the english, and everyone else - if all, I repeat ALL of those people had been conscientious objectors, then ipso facto - no war.
In 1936 Hitler ordered German troops to enter the Rhineland. At this point the German army was not very strong and could have been easily defeated. Yet neither France nor Britain was prepared to start another war.
Come of it leon. I would expect a 5 child to say something like "Well, why did they just not fight"
You make it out as if the lads could have just thought "ah [Poor language removed] it, cant be arsed going on that boat and landing on that beach to be shot at to [Poor language removed], i'll go home and have a pint"
If your going to say anything so idealised, how about "If Hitler hadn't been born...' or perhaps something more realistic as in 'If England/France had the bottle to declare war on Germany much earlier' - you know, as soon as Germany invaded Rhineland;