Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

DIC back in the ring for RS

Status
Not open for further replies.

Piijt

Player Valuation: £20m
Have a laugh lads.
From the Echo.

DUBAI International Capital is ready to make an offer for Tom Hicks’s stake in Liverpool FC.

The ECHO understands senior executives at the Dubai-based international investment company were given the go-ahead by Sheikh Mohammed Al Maktoum to launch a second bid to buy into Liverpool in a year.

An offer has been agreed in principle.

Co-owners Hicks and Gillett are edging closer to clinching a refinancing deal.

But DIC are hoping to make a move before any deal is completed.

Hicks and Gillet enjoyed a honeymoon period after their acquisition of the Reds.

But recent revelations they talked to Jurgen Klinsmann about the possibility of replacing the hugely popular Rafael Benitez as manager have led to them falling out of favour with the Liverpool fans.

While the financial restructuring deal, which would give them the necessary collateral to fund the building of the long-awaited new stadium, remains incomplete, DIC believe a window of opportunity still remains open to them.
New owners George Gillett (left) and Tom Hicks at Anfield

Whether Hicks is willing to sell is another matter entirely.

The Dallas-based multi-millionaire is on record saying he is not interested in selling his stake, even though there are tensions between himself and Gillett about the proposed refinancing deal.

In a recent interview with the ECHO Hicks said: “I just want to clear up with you that I am not selling any of my shares to anybody.

“I have no idea why anyone would think that. It was just rubbish.”

But with Sheikh Mohammed, one of the world’s richest men, now back on the scene Hicks looks likely to face some tough decisions in the days to come.

On the one hand a deal with DIC could present him with a sizeable return on his initial investment and an opportunity to walk away from the dual problems of securing the necessary loans to service their own debt, fund the new stadium and winning the fans over all over again.

But, on the other, there may be a reluctance to part with an asset which he fought so hard to acquire, one which he firmly believes can pay dividends in the long term.

Hicks insists financial restructuring could be complete within days, and if he is proven right it will make an immediate offer from DIC less likely.

The American pair have six weeks to secure a £350m loan that would refinance their original purchase of the club.

Hicks recently told the ECHO he hopes a deal can be signed off with the Royal Bank of Scotland and the US investment bank Wachovia by the middle of next week.

If, as expected, DIC follow up their interest with a firm bid the ownership of Liverpool FC could change for the second time in a year.

Club officials said today: “We do not comment on speculation.

Anfield fans in fear as Liverpool's future is on knife edge


DURING an exhaustive search for investment in Liverpool Football Club Reds chief executive Rick Parry spoke of the need for any deal to be absolutely right.

“You can only sell the family silver once,” he famously remarked.

Today Liverpool are facing up to the previously unimaginable possibility of half of the family silver being sold for the second time in less than a year – if Tom Hicks is willing to sell.

DIC loom large on the Anfield horizon again.

After missing out to Hicks and George Gillett last time around Sheikh Mohammed Al Maktoum is understood to be ready to do everything in his power to ensure it does not happen again.
Crown Prince of Dubai, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum

But despite being one of the richest men in the world Sheikh Mohammed does not use his immense wealth to pay over the odds for any business.

When he was beaten to the punch by Hicks and Gillett last February one of his most trusted aides told the world bluntly “we won’t overpay for assets”.

So, if a deal is to be struck, it must suit all parties.

DIC chief executive and self-confessed Liverpool fan Sameer Al Ansari intimated the investment vehicle’s interest in the club ended when Hicks and Gillett took control.

But in reality their interest has never really gone away.

In the autumn they entered into talks with Hicks and Gillett with a view to snapping up a minority share of between 10-20% - only for any potential deal to founder on the Americans’ £1bn valuation of the club.

Now they are looking at setting up a deal in which they would buy, at the very least, a 50% share in Liverpool.

A firm bid could be forthcoming within days.

It is undoubtedly decision time for Hicks and Gillett who thought they had seen off DIC’s interest once and for all when they paid £218.9m for Liverpool last February.

But since then plans to refinance their initial purchase and pay for the long-awaited new Anfield with a new loan running into hundreds of millions of pounds have been slowed down by the American credit crunch making borrowing money much more difficult than it was 12 months ago.

There has also been a reticence from honorary life president and former chairman David Moores and Parry to sign up to a refinancing package which will plunge the club into hundreds of millions of pounds of debt.

As progress has stalled DIC has stepped up its long-standing interest and it is now ready to pounce.

Their desire is understood to have been fuelled by speculation Moores is becoming increasingly minded he should have gone with DIC rather than Hicks and Gillett when both parties put forward rival bids last year.

The fact Liverpool fans displayed their displeasure with the way the club is being run by the American pair at Anfield on Tuesday night did not go unnoticed in Dubai.

Banners unfurled on the Kop during the FA Cup tie against Luton Town sent an SOS to DIC and there were several negative chants directed at Hicks and Gillett.

It could be that, like his fellow countryman, Man United owner Malcolm Glazer, Hicks is prepared to ride out any storm of controversy whipped up by unsettled fans.

But as a businessman of international repute, he will also be aware such naked negativity from his customers is not sustainable in the long term.

Liverpool’s very future is today on a knife edge.

The family silver could be up for grabs again.

Although it is still too early to tell whether it will eventually change hands, DIC are certainly ready to test the water.

Aims and assets of DIC

DUBAI International Capital (DIC) was established in October 2004 as the international investment arm of Dubai Holding.

The purpose of DIC is to create a return for its shareholder Dubai Holding and its ultimate shareholders, the ruling family of the Emirate of Dubai.

Its assets and investments include:

Travelodge – the UK budget hotel group was purchased in 2006 for £675m.

Mauser Group – the German industrial packaging company – one of the world’s leaders in its field – bought in June last year for 850m Euros.

A 3% stake in Sony acquired for $1.5bn.

A substantial stake in HSBC.

A 2% stake in German carmaker Daimler. which cost $1bn

A $1.25bn stake in the New York hedge fund Och-Ziff.
 
My guess is the Americans will sell and walk away with an US$150 million profit between them.

Afterall a football club is only a commodity as far as investors are concerned.
 
One thing is for sure, it will work out for them as it always does.

I wouldnt mind enjoying Hicks and Gillett in charge for a couple of years more.
Son in law a RS reckons it will be announced on 18 or 19 th of next month he texted early Wednesday his brother gets info from someone at the club but I reckon hes right about 60% of the time
 
Nothing will be announced. Hicks and "the best a RS can get" have come out and said a sale is too far from the truth to be considered serious.

Chico's and my own dream stays true. The Yanks are here to stay.

WOOHOO, Toffees for the first prem title on merseyside.
 

they'd get boat loads of money, but i think i'd prefer the DIC take over. Think of the hassle they'd have to go through with airport security :D :D
 

Apparently the equity markets are negative to the beck and call of Gillette and Hicks. Dubai will be the only ones in the game come crunch time. Expect this to unravel Benitez and his merry men into medocrity very soon if they haven't already reached this point.
 
Exactly Mike. Their loan is up for renewal in a few weeks and none of the banks are touching them with a bargepole. That's why the stadium has been scaled back, that's why Benethus has no money for players. It wouldn't surprise me if Hicks and Gillette didn't approach DIC pimping the club.
 
Bruce you can imagine the look on my face when I heard that. Does the Cheshire Cat on Alice in Wonderland give it any more creedence. I just love this unrest and pointing fingers and all the usual spin from the Red front office saying everything is just peachy.

The main point is we are slowly but surely building a empire the right way. Keeping the merchinaries out from the squad and the less than savvy investors who want to make a quick profit and tear apart our storied tradition. When everyone is in hock such as the Leeds debacle some years ago then it will become clearer to most. Chelsea less Abramovich bankrupt. United heavy laden with debt. The [Poor language removed] having the same burden. Could Arsenal & Everton be the next mega clubs due to frugal expenditures and solid fundamentals. I certainly hope so.(y)

http://www.sportinglife.com/footbal...STORY_NAME=soccer/08/01/22/manual_085702.html
 
Last edited:
Well both Arsenal and Man Utd have a lot of debt too. Arsenal took on a lot to build the Emirates and Man Utd were saddled with a lot when the Glazer family bought them. The difference is that both make a whole lot of money. Arsenal boast of making more from each fan than any other club in the country, and United are arguably the most commercial side in the world, so both have plenty of income to both service their existing deals and to leverage new terms.

Liverpool don't. This is largely why they want to move stadium. They're not making enough money from matches. They earnt £122 million in the year they won the CL. Compare that to the £245m United just announced and the £200m+ from Arsenal and they lag way behind. Even Chelsea earnt around £160m and they don't have the history or the fan base of any of their main rivals.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top