Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Everton vs West Ham - Tactical Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

HuddersfieldToffee

Player Valuation: £10m
Everton 2-3 West Ham - Everton start with a 3-4-3, Mirallas causes problems until dismissal
Screenshot 2016-03-08 16.23.02.webp


Initial Formations

Initial formations prior to the sending off, the front six for Everton, the two wing-backs, Barkley and the Front Three were very fluid but most of the switches seemed very pre-planned rather than off the cuff. Lennon and Mirallas occasionally switched, but both had similar rolls either side, Lennon counter-attacking by staying closer to the space in behind Ogbonna, to whom Lukaku would drop for longer balls, in order to run in behind and did a similar job running at Kouyate on the opposite flank. Mirallas would drop inside and a little deeper but would also drift to the touchline to allow Oviedo to underlap. Lukaku would drop, usually to either of the outside centre-backs, usually Ogbonna as Cresswell would sit a little bit deeper as the more natural defender of the wing-back pair.

Screenshot 2016-03-08 18.28.51.webp

Everton's inital 3-4-3, with Oviedo and Coleman playing fluid roles, mainly in reaction to the movements of Mirallas and Lennon.

Below shows an early attack with the initial positions and interplay. It can clearly be seen that McCarthy is playing slightly deeper with Barkley moving into the half-space, which is well covered by Pedro Obiang. Romelu Lukaku moved often towards the right side to exploit longer balls for runs in behind by Lennon, who has come ball side of Lennon and is in the half-space between Ogbonna and Cresswell. Mirallas varied his position intelligently to allow for variation between an underlap and overlaps with Oviedo. Coleman played a slightly more conventional wing-back role. The movement was quite encouraging early on, but looked like the system could use more time to bed in.

Screenshot 2016-03-08 18.03.05.webp


West Ham played an interesting cross between a 5-3-2 and 5-2-2-1, with Payet moving closer to Emineke and Lanzini playing a shuttling role closer to the midfield. They played with a low block early on, but gradually started to draw higher after about 25 minutes. Payet gradually found more promising positions and the whole possession game from West Ham felt more stable, even early on. With such a system, Everton perhaps would have been better to drop into 5-4-1 and use more pace to counter behind the space left by Antonio and to a lesser extent Cresswell. Despite this, and possibly with the home crowds eagerness to retain the ball and move it more threateningly with switches of play, Martinez tried an initially quick passing game for the first phase of the play, before gradually switching to a more possessional orientated style with the ball moving from side to side to pull gaps in the system. West Ham were organised however and in this phase of play they were caught out by pressing traps by Bilic's men.

They gained more of the ball as West Ham slowed the game down forcing the Toffees into their second phase of play, counter-attacking into the space behind with a varied positioning of Noble and Obiang moving to a position to move the balls to the wingbacks and a variation between Lanzini spiriting wide with Payet moving into the ten-space position behind Emineke and Lanzini drifting forward with Payet spriting behind Stones into the wings. Noble would then assume a higher position with Obiang playing a true holder in front of Ogbonna, Oxford, and Kouyate who played as a standard three-chain with the outside centre backs holding a tighter distance between the two than their Blue counterparts, to protect against counter attacks through the centre, confident that Pedro Obiang could drop in and defend as a forward playing sweeper of sorts.

Early Lukaku Goal

Everton gained an early advantage which showed the benefits of the attacking system with a back three. Oviedo always used an extremely varied game with his positioning throughout the first half, coming inside to balance the runs of Mirallas with his lateral and direct movements with the ball, which caused him to be forced to vary to prevent congesting the wing zone and balancing the options for the man on the ball. The first goal saw Oviedo start wide and drift inside to a central position, balanced by the cover of Mirallas dropping deeper and wider. Oviedo and Mirallas dragged both Antonio and Kouyate into a position too narrow which caused a hole to appear in the West Ham defence. Lukaku moved to overload Reece Oxford and Oviedo's direct run gave him room to take it to feet without double pressure and turn the West Ham youngster, while Oviedo moved further inside to prepare for any counter-pressing that could be had.
 
After The Sending Off

Screenshot 2016-03-09 17.41.41.webp


After Mirallas was sent off for a second bookable offence, Martinez responded by changing the system to a 4-3-2-0 system, with Lennon and Lukaku playing together up front but measuring their build up play to cover space more effectively. After half time Stones was withdrawn for the energetic and defensively minded Besic, who played a shuttling role through sprinting into further advance positions but behind Barkley to form a pivot for switching attacks through transitions and moving further forward as the team moved forward. A key tactical feature of the game when ahead is reducing the 'active game area', the area where most players are congested. If the ball is concentrated and hard to move efficiently, the extra man is almost irrelevant, as teams can use simple combinations to counter attack.

Screenshot 2016-03-09 15.43.13.webp

Closer examination of Everton's system after Mirallas' red card


Defensive Instabilities
Everton combined well but left themselves often with too many players conflicting positions, a slightly more noticeable sign of a theme of the whole game for Everton. West Ham adopted a system of generally sitting in a 4-3-2-1/4-3-1-2 system with a lot of fluidity between Sahko and Payet, while Carroll played more as a hold up and a conventional striker role. Song replaced Obiang and played more of a 'half-back' role, moving either to the right or between the centre backs to allow both Cresswell and Antonio to bomb forward and Kouyate a chance to rotate and overload the midfield in possession. This was intelligent play from the Londoners. Everton's second goal came from another similar inside run from Oviedo, this time balanced by Lennon, coming inside to allow room to run at the defence. Everton benefitted from this balance and crafted an excellent example of the combinations of speed, power and skill that has graced some of the better performances of Martinez reign.

From this 2-0 lead, it's easy to see that tiredness had set in for the Toffees, however there were a few tactical decisions that were questionable to say the least. The replacement of Aaron Lennon with Oumar Niasse, a languid lateral striker who played a role mainly to stretch the play and counter inside the wing-spaces. He seemed far too energetic and disorganised in his early minutes and lost his position a couple of times. Also, Everton made some basic defensive errors, with poor positioning leading to the corner that caused the first goal, and poor positioning from the cross leading to the goal. With two large targets to aim for, the crossing of Antonio and Cresswell now had a better and more direct aim as well as targets for through balls from Payet. The final goal came from a long ball from Cresswell to the target of Carroll, and Sahko and Payet combined for a simple pass in behind the Everton defence.

Everton found themselves too easily beaten in one-on-one situations and struggled where there was a strong, tall striker like Carroll, who had backed himself on to Ramiro Funes Mori, who was one of a number of Everton players who played a tremendously poor games for the Blues today. Everton's system was balanced with 11 men on the field, but Everton were damned by poor discipline without the ball and with a lack of an integrated pressing strategy. If RM wants to further himself tactically, it would be to master the less beautiful aspects of the game and look at high, integrated pressing that would allow a platform for the sides natural speed and skill.
 

Sorry but don´t agree. We do start with a 5-4-1 and that is unacceptable in a team which pretends to be important.
If Everton played well was against Martinez intention. No more to say.
Only when Mirallas was sent off the team moved to 4-4-1 (no other possibility to Martinez) and Everton started playing well.
Martinez kidnapping two times at Everton, first with the initial 5-4-1, secondly with the substitution of Lennon for Niasse (13.5M!!!!). Martinez was our worst enemy last Saturday.
Everton has a much better roster than West Ham but Martinez is not capable to manage it.
 
Sorry but don´t agree. We do start with a 5-4-1 and that is unacceptable in a team which pretends to be important.
If Everton played well was against Martinez intention. No more to say.
Only when Mirallas was sent off the team moved to 4-4-1 (no other possibility to Martinez) and Everton started playing well.
Martinez kidnapping two times at Everton, first with the initial 5-4-1, secondly with the substitution of Lennon for Niasse (13.5M!!!!). Martinez was our worst enemy last Saturday.
Everton has a much better roster than West Ham but Martinez is not capable to manage it.

Why is that unacceptable?

It worked! West Ham are in good form and as the formation shows what we did was match them as they play 5-3-2...

We were set up to match that and open up the space to counter them when the gaps opened up. It worked and we took the lead but then sat back too deep, but sill looked solid until Mirallas got sent off so as you said we moved into the new system.

The sub has been questioned and rightly so as it was a strange one. Up until that point it was a perfect display from team and manager bar the penalty miss. To say otherwise can only be clouded by a disdain for the manager - who looked to employ a different system at home in the hope of changing our form.
 
Great read. Will you be doing this for every game?

I'll do them as much as I can, I get time during the week because, being a student, when everyone else is at work I have time to write Everton tactical reviews.

Sorry but don´t agree. We do start with a 5-4-1 and that is unacceptable in a team which pretends to be important.

Any tactic is relevant to the players who play within it. You can play a 5-4-1 with 5 Natural CBs, 4 Natural CDMs and a CM if you wanted to, and that would be stupid because you're offering no attacking threat. In fact, when we played a progressive 3-4-3 (it was not a 5-4-1 because the wing-backs played a varied role more like that of Alaba and Lahm in Bayern's system than, say Cafu and Carlos in the Brazil 2002 team). Our downfall was that the player who played in the pivotal RW role, Mirallas, pissed our chances up against the wall. In fact, when we switched to a 4-4-3-2-0 (not a 4-4-1 because Lennon was playing higher up and in the half spaces with Lukaku) we started to look a little less stable in possession.

Niasse has been unfit and was brought on for long balls and to benefit a tired team, the goals were ALL set piece failures, i.e about 40 yards further forward from where Niasse was signed to have any impact. I think the possession game needs more work and the pressing game, vitally needs more work to give them a platform to build attacks, but these are things that were nothing to do with playing three centre backs. In fact, if we want a better pressing game, most pressing teams play three centre backs to cover the back line more effectively with a player who can drop into the back line when needs be in possession. James McCarthy has done this for Wigan as well.
 
I'll do them as much as I can, I get time during the week because, being a student, when everyone else is at work I have time to write Everton tactical reviews.



Any tactic is relevant to the players who play within it. You can play a 5-4-1 with 5 Natural CBs, 4 Natural CDMs and a CM if you wanted to, and that would be stupid because you're offering no attacking threat. In fact, when we played a progressive 3-4-3 (it was not a 5-4-1 because the wing-backs played a varied role more like that of Alaba and Lahm in Bayern's system than, say Cafu and Carlos in the Brazil 2002 team). Our downfall was that the player who played in the pivotal RW role, Mirallas, pissed our chances up against the wall. In fact, when we switched to a 4-4-3-2-0 (not a 4-4-1 because Lennon was playing higher up and in the half spaces with Lukaku) we started to look a little less stable in possession.

Niasse has been unfit and was brought on for long balls and to benefit a tired team, the goals were ALL set piece failures, i.e about 40 yards further forward from where Niasse was signed to have any impact. I think the possession game needs more work and the pressing game, vitally needs more work to give them a platform to build attacks, but these are things that were nothing to do with playing three centre backs. In fact, if we want a better pressing game, most pressing teams play three centre backs to cover the back line more effectively with a player who can drop into the back line when needs be in possession. James McCarthy has done this for Wigan as well.

Yep mate and your first formation image shows that's what Jimmy Mac was doing.

I actually think 3-4-3 worked well and we looked dangerous going forward in that W.Ham couldn't cope with our three attackers.

Think it could well be the way to go in home games that require us to be more on the front foot and break teams down:
 
Yep mate and your first formation image shows that's what Jimmy Mac was doing.

I actually think 3-4-3 worked well and we looked dangerous going forward in that W.Ham couldn't cope with our three attackers.

Think it could well be the way to go in home games that require us to be more on the front foot and break teams down:

Well, if you look at ZM's analysis of RM's Wigan team in the three at the back, it is astonishingly similar in tactical roles except that of the wingbacks that I found while researching RM's time at Wigan

wigan1.jpg
Screenshot 2016-03-08 18.28.51.webp


The Main Differences are that the wing-backs in this system play an exclusively game stretching role, designed to make the pitch bigger while in possession. The front three are the creative forces which allow McArthur to play a more defensive role than Barkley, with Maloney and Di Santo dropping deeper to make space for Moses and the wing-backs forward movements. Lukaku plays more of a conventional striker role and in possession the back-three for Everton are better at recycling possession, so Barkley plays a further advanced and fluid role but the role of McCarthy is frighteningly similar. I can see this becoming our default, with the ability to quickly change into a 4-3-3, being our default in the next few years is RM stays on, but even without that, the team has the ability to play (well) the vogue formation of choice. With the movements, and developments like taking Baines to see Philip Lahm play last year, we could see Baines operating in a left-half sort of role in the coming years, able to sit with the CBs without the ball but cutting inside to be a creative force, allowing a natural winger (Deulofeu, Lennon) to play a wider role.
 

After The Sending Off

View attachment 19028

After Mirallas was sent off for a second bookable offence, Martinez responded by changing the system to a 4-3-2-0 system, with Lennon and Lukaku playing together up front but measuring their build up play to cover space more effectively. After half time Stones was withdrawn for the energetic and defensively minded Besic, who played a shuttling role through sprinting into further advance positions but behind Barkley to form a pivot for switching attacks through transitions and moving further forward as the team moved forward. A key tactical feature of the game when ahead is reducing the 'active game area', the area where most players are congested. If the ball is concentrated and hard to move efficiently, the extra man is almost irrelevant, as teams can use simple combinations to counter attack.

View attachment 19026
Closer examination of Everton's system after Mirallas' red card


Defensive Instabilities
Everton combined well but left themselves often with too many players conflicting positions, a slightly more noticeable sign of a theme of the whole game for Everton. West Ham adopted a system of generally sitting in a 4-3-2-1/4-3-1-2 system with a lot of fluidity between Sahko and Payet, while Carroll played more as a hold up and a conventional striker role. Song replaced Obiang and played more of a 'half-back' role, moving either to the right or between the centre backs to allow both Cresswell and Antonio to bomb forward and Kouyate a chance to rotate and overload the midfield in possession. This was intelligent play from the Londoners. Everton's second goal came from another similar inside run from Oviedo, this time balanced by Lennon, coming inside to allow room to run at the defence. Everton benefitted from this balance and crafted an excellent example of the combinations of speed, power and skill that has graced some of the better performances of Martinez reign.

From this 2-0 lead, it's easy to see that tiredness had set in for the Toffees, however there were a few tactical decisions that were questionable to say the least. The replacement of Aaron Lennon with Oumar Niasse, a languid lateral striker who played a role mainly to stretch the play and counter inside the wing-spaces. He seemed far too energetic and disorganised in his early minutes and lost his position a couple of times. Also, Everton made some basic defensive errors, with poor positioning leading to the corner that caused the first goal, and poor positioning from the cross leading to the goal. With two large targets to aim for, the crossing of Antonio and Cresswell now had a better and more direct aim as well as targets for through balls from Payet. The final goal came from a long ball from Cresswell to the target of Carroll, and Sahko and Payet combined for a simple pass in behind the Everton defence.

Everton found themselves too easily beaten in one-on-one situations and struggled where there was a strong, tall striker like Carroll, who had backed himself on to Ramiro Funes Mori, who was one of a number of Everton players who played a tremendously poor games for the Blues today. Everton's system was balanced with 11 men on the field, but Everton were damned by poor discipline without the ball and with a lack of an integrated pressing strategy. If RM wants to further himself tactically, it would be to master the less beautiful aspects of the game and look at high, integrated pressing that would allow a platform for the sides natural speed and skill.
No offence, but if there isn't equal numbers in both teams I find it hard to understand how a tactical overview of any game makes sense. Quite obviously, from the 34th minute on when that Belgian chicken with no head was dismissed, the game becomes dominated by one team having to stretch and contract play as much as they can get away with in order to get breathing space and lock down, respectively...a situation that doesn't lend itself to any firm conclusion about who won or lost a tactical battle.
 
No offence, but if there isn't equal numbers in both teams I find it hard to understand how a tactical overview of any game makes sense. Quite obviously, from the 34th minute on when that Belgian chicken with no head was dismissed, the game becomes dominated by one team having to stretch and contract play as much as they can get away with in order to get breathing space and lock down, respectively...a situation that doesn't lend itself to any firm conclusion about who won or lost a tactical battle.

I must admit, reading it back I could have explained this a bit further. What I was trying to say was when a team is ahead and a man behind the job of the team is to reduce the area where players can play. This benefits a narrower team that plays in a compact shape. Everton did this well in their transitions, which they are generally quite good at. They failed (and subsequently began to lose the tactical battle) because they lost discipline in the shape and Lennon, who could tuck in and support Besic and allow Barkley to defend wider, was replaced for Niasse who was too energetic and disorganised.

The diagram has uneven players because it's after the sending off, when West Ham had changed their system to cope with the 4 v 5 in the centre with Kouyate moving into midfield as Song varied his position as a pivot for the attack. Kouyate would also launch attacks through defending on the front foot into space, where there was a distinct lack of Everton pressing to guard against the counter. Even with a less man, more disciplined pressing teams would have attacked with the ability to counter-press, or win the ball while the opposition is in transition between moving from defensive possession to attacking possession or the initial loss of shape from a quick, fluid break.
 
Well, if you look at ZM's analysis of RM's Wigan team in the three at the back, it is astonishingly similar in tactical roles except that of the wingbacks that I found while researching RM's time at Wigan

wigan1.jpg
View attachment 19210

The Main Differences are that the wing-backs in this system play an exclusively game stretching role, designed to make the pitch bigger while in possession. The front three are the creative forces which allow McArthur to play a more defensive role than Barkley, with Maloney and Di Santo dropping deeper to make space for Moses and the wing-backs forward movements. Lukaku plays more of a conventional striker role and in possession the back-three for Everton are better at recycling possession, so Barkley plays a further advanced and fluid role but the role of McCarthy is frighteningly similar. I can see this becoming our default, with the ability to quickly change into a 4-3-3, being our default in the next few years is RM stays on, but even without that, the team has the ability to play (well) the vogue formation of choice. With the movements, and developments like taking Baines to see Philip Lahm play last year, we could see Baines operating in a left-half sort of role in the coming years, able to sit with the CBs without the ball but cutting inside to be a creative force, allowing a natural winger (Deulofeu, Lennon) to play a wider role.

I agree mate.

Was thinking that something like this may be the way to go against teams that we have to be on the front foot against at home. Allows space for the likes of Barkley and Lennon to float around and we're solid but 'dynamic' in the middle with Besic and McCarthy.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-03-11 at 18.05.25.webp
    Screen Shot 2016-03-11 at 18.05.25.webp
    13.8 KB · Views: 99
While I'm using this site... this is what I'd personally like to see v Chelsea (presuming Hazard now starts out wide left for them with Willian in the middle and Pedro out wide right).

Get Besic marking Hazard and make sure McCarthy sticks to whoever their no.10 is (presuming Willian...)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-03-11 at 18.11.08.webp
    Screen Shot 2016-03-11 at 18.11.08.webp
    13.6 KB · Views: 97

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top