First post from me here. As the name suggests I’m a City fan and I’m here for a sensible and objective discussion.
I’d been scanning forums for a collective view on Peps style of play since coming to City and have been surprised by some of the ultra negative opinions on him.
For anyone interested here’s a City fans opinion on him;
He was regarded as the best coach in the world (or one of) and many top English clubs would have given their right arms to have him.
When he chose City the opinions started to change. In our usual English way we lauded someone and then look to knock them over.
In his first year he was heavily slated for kicking out Joe Hart - he did not fit his style of play (which to be fair we knew little about at the time). He brought in Bravo who was a nightmare but knew how Pep wanted to play. Pep stuck with him under a barrage of crticism.
He kept playing the style of football we were starting to question - we got smashed at Leicester and at Everton and doubts were starting to creep in.
He continued on that path but knowing our weakness was that we simply had four full backs in their 30’s and a squad the hadn’t been moved on by pellegrini.
He changed the playing staff over rapidly - yes, it cost a bucket load of money- but he changed.
We are now seeing that his ideas that got ridiculed last year are producing some mesmerising football.
He’s improved Stones, Otamendi, Delph, Sterling, KDB to name a few. He’s created a beast of a team.Other managers (including some of our own) have spent £££’s and failed.
Here’s my point in short - he’s not just bought players and slotted the into a usual style of play (which Mancini/ pellegrini did) - he’s bought young players and moulded them into a team playing a brand of football I haven’t seen before.
The the frightening thing is that this team is probably 3-5 years from peaking and he should get a little bit of credit, not for just spending, but for what he’s making them do.
Tixi signs the players thought mert.