Lennon or Walcott?

[DanEFC92]

Overrated, the pair of them.

 

[ianefc]

Lennon is ****e, other than speen nothing, Walcott is by far the superior

 

[Slavan]

lennon is to obviously one footed

go with walcott.

 

[Deloodid]

V

Neither

 

[MartSlinger]

Neither.

 

[Nordecke]

Lennon is more direct and I've seen him look unstoppable at times.. Theo does nothing for me.

 

[RFUS]

Lennon is more direct and I've seen him look unstoppable at times.. Theo does nothing for me.

He's, as Goat would say, a 1 in 20 player.

Walcott is more of a 1 in 15 player.

So I'd go Walcott, but neither are nearly as good as they're made out to be. They're just fast.

 

[MartSlinger]

No footballing brain. If they did they would be amongst the best wingers in the world. Walcott still plays like a 16yr old. Oxlade-Chamberlain will be a much, much better player than Walcott.

 

[TX Bill]

Both...

 

[pfim]

Neither and both. Neither very good, both should be playing over James Milner in the England squad.

 

[FTY]

Lads???

 

[ijjysmith]

Oh CHRIST.

I'm scared to go back and look who I picked.

 

[ijjysmith]

GET IN

I didn't post in here.

 

[toffee matt]

Walcott due to his better goal scoring record

 

[formerly manx toffee]

Walcott....clearly