bluebastardo
Player Valuation: £40m
I'm a great believer that if clubs can only buy / sell players during the transfer windows , then that same rule should apply to their managers.
I think it's rediculous the way some managers can be sacked within a few games , and even before they have managed a game like the recent debacle at Southampton.
It's no fluke that managers who have had chance to create a squad, and fine tune it over time are responsible for 4 out of the top 5 teams in the league.
If a club could only deal with managers during the windows, especially the summer window, then it would cause less chaos , and the chances are that the said managers could prove to be better than first impressions suggest, and clubs such as Newcastle for example would likely have avoided relegation.
Managers should not be allowed to resign either outside of these periods, or be poached by other clubs, and should be punished by the FA should they do so.
Clubs should not be allowed to be taken over unless during these periods either.
If the ruling is good enough for players, then surely it's good enough for managers.
I think it would benefit the game if this were the case.
I have a few arguments for and against, but I hope you guys might find this topic interesting enough to debate amongst yourselves.
It would be interesting to know your opinions on this matter .
Thanks in advance.
I think it's rediculous the way some managers can be sacked within a few games , and even before they have managed a game like the recent debacle at Southampton.
It's no fluke that managers who have had chance to create a squad, and fine tune it over time are responsible for 4 out of the top 5 teams in the league.
If a club could only deal with managers during the windows, especially the summer window, then it would cause less chaos , and the chances are that the said managers could prove to be better than first impressions suggest, and clubs such as Newcastle for example would likely have avoided relegation.
Managers should not be allowed to resign either outside of these periods, or be poached by other clubs, and should be punished by the FA should they do so.
Clubs should not be allowed to be taken over unless during these periods either.
If the ruling is good enough for players, then surely it's good enough for managers.
I think it would benefit the game if this were the case.
I have a few arguments for and against, but I hope you guys might find this topic interesting enough to debate amongst yourselves.
It would be interesting to know your opinions on this matter .
Thanks in advance.
Last edited: