Sverre Takleifbotten
Player Valuation: £750k
If you have not warmed up properly, it is not uncommon for the pulse to go completely crazy after a few sprints. That's probably what happened here.
He only got substituted. It was questionable, and he'll have been embarrassed by it, but you can't be going on strike because you got subbed off. Honestly it's nowhere near as big a deal as is being made out in some quarters.Wonder if ancelotti already spoke with the player bearing in mind what happened on Sunday...wouldn't surprise me...there hasn't been much noise from kean which it's surprising. Many players would have either refuse to train or even go on strike until they get the move they want.
I wonder whether or not Kean would have been puffing and blowing and generally appearing so unfit after 10 minutes on Sunday if he'd been starting
matches regularly this season. You can have the last word on this subject if you like, because that's mine.
And I wonder whether perhaps if he wasn't appearing so unfit after 10 minutes he would be starting matches regularly this season.
I know exactly what you meant, but it depends on how you define 'match fit'. Players who've been injured and out for as little as ,say, three weeks are often
referred to as not being match fit. Their level of cardio fitness would be unlikely to have fallen to such a level as to be puffed out in such a short time.
If Kean's cardio fitness was at a level that you'd expect in someone who trains regularly in an elite sport, which is likely, why was he puffed out so quickly?
There's no point in us being pedantic with each other. I'm just posing the question.
He's been paid a fortune and he can't even get himself in shape which then lead to him not being able/willing to follow instructions. Real shame but this kid looks like a dud so far. hopefully this is the kick up the arse he needs
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50802290
Just how off the pace was Kean?
In terms of his general play, Kean had nine touches of the ball - the fewest of any player until his replacement, Niasse, came on for the final two minutes and touched the ball four times.
Kean won none of his five duels with Manchester United players, and lost the ball six times while making no tackles.
Niasse, in contrast, won 50% of his duels and did not lose possession once while making two tackles - as many as centre-back Michael Keane.
He's been paid a fortune and he can't even get himself in shape which then lead to him not being able/willing to follow instructions. Real shame but this kid looks like a dud so far. hopefully this is the kick up the arse he needs
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50802290
Just how off the pace was Kean?
In the 18 minutes he was on he did not manage a shot of any type. Not particularly great for a striker and especially one still searching for his first goal for the club but then Everton were, at that point, under pressure from the hosts and instead holding out for a point rather than going for a win.
In terms of his general play, Kean had nine touches of the ball - the fewest of any player until his replacement, Niasse, came on for the final two minutes and touched the ball four times.
Kean won none of his five duels with Manchester United players, and lost the ball six times while making no tackles.
Niasse, in contrast, won 50% of his duels and did not lose possession once while making two tackles - as many as centre-back Michael Keane.
Those statistics perhaps justify the tactical reasoning behind the change, but what do you think?
In terms of the game there is not disputing it was a sensible change. It's the long term ramifications that make it questionable.He's been paid a fortune and he can't even get himself in shape which then lead to him not being able/willing to follow instructions. Real shame but this kid looks like a dud so far. hopefully this is the kick up the arse he needs
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50802290
Just how off the pace was Kean?
In the 18 minutes he was on he did not manage a shot of any type. Not particularly great for a striker and especially one still searching for his first goal for the club but then Everton were, at that point, under pressure from the hosts and instead holding out for a point rather than going for a win.
In terms of his general play, Kean had nine touches of the ball - the fewest of any player until his replacement, Niasse, came on for the final two minutes and touched the ball four times.
Kean won none of his five duels with Manchester United players, and lost the ball six times while making no tackles.
Niasse, in contrast, won 50% of his duels and did not lose possession once while making two tackles - as many as centre-back Michael Keane.
Those statistics perhaps justify the tactical reasoning behind the change, but what do you think?
If we were in a different position, both in the league and trying to gain some momentum ahead of a key cup tie, I’d have been far more critical of the move.In terms of the game there is not disputing it was a sensible change. It's the long term ramifications that make it questionable.
Some people saying as if he is the worst subs
in football history.
I saw many players in the blue shirt played badly than him more than 90 minutes or almost the whole time when they were here![]()