Actually I wasn't.I presume that you're basing this unduly negative assessment on the fact that Goodison isn't always full to capacity. According to the club's own data, over a quarter of the seats at Goodison have an obstructed view! I wouldn't expect any club in world football to fill such a stadium every week. Who wants to fork out £40 to sit behind a post? In our new stadium, none of the seats will have an even remotely obstructed view.
When Arsenal played at Highbury they almost never had capacity attendances and Highbury only held 39,000 people. Conversely, the Emirates, a stadium with a capacity of 60,000, is almost always full. Fans are much more likely to fork out for a ticket at a state-of-the-art stadium than at a stadium that is riddled with obstructed views.
I was basing it on economics and demographics.
We have a pretty singular fan base with a very high percentage of match day attendees from around the area.
The reason why the Emirates is successful is because it has attracted corporate support and the gentry. That's largely because of the demographic of the surrounding area.
Have you been the Arsenal? It's £6 a pint and £5 for a portion of chips. Plus the standard match day ticket is on average about £60-70. All that and the atmosphere is rubbish because of the proportion of actual fans to day trippers.
In my opinion, we'd struggle to fill a 60k state of the art stadium without doing what West Ham have done and that has killed any atmosphere that stadium could have had.