Librarian
Player Valuation: £70m
Would love to see ground-breaking stadium architecture rather than another cereal bowl
The IKEA Flat Pack Arena will be a monument to modern Swedish architecture
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would love to see ground-breaking stadium architecture rather than another cereal bowl
I suppose there's no where else nearby that's big enough.It is essentially landlocked. If it were to happen could take up to 2 seasons so where would we play, Anfield?
It still wouldn't be Goodison though mate, which has always been my argument against the sentimentality of staying at the same location.
Excellent, what is your view on my suggestion that we would be classed as high risk to banks and lenders. To sort a recent dispute on here.
Also, your take on the Vibrac loans would be good as well.
Our credit risk is improving but we will still be seen as risky until we improve cash flow. The vibrac loans are not unusual but they are needed because we rely on TV money and match day which dry up in summer. If we can boost commercial revenues we deal with the credit risk and cash flow issues. A new stadium is not a panacea but it should help. Pushing this as a regeneration scheme may mean LCC can help us access lower cost funding than we can alone but at this stage that is just a hope not a fact.
I was there at the enquiry mate, These are the quotes from the enquiry
“But it's confirmed in a letter from Deloitte, Dan Jones stated from our work with the club to date on its business plan we understand the annual potential business to the club of the new stadium is of the order of £6M” “Robert Elstone replied “That's profit not revenue”
“And just to confirm” Colin asked, “this figure is based on a target of 47,000?” “Yes” was Robert Elstone's reply.
Our credit risk is improving but we will still be seen as risky until we improve cash flow. The vibrac loans are not unusual but they are needed because we rely on TV money and match day which dry up in summer. If we can boost commercial revenues we deal with the credit risk and cash flow issues. A new stadium is not a panacea but it should help. Pushing this as a regeneration scheme may mean LCC can help us access lower cost funding than we can alone but at this stage that is just a hope not a fact.
Our credit risk is improving but we will still be seen as risky until we improve cash flow. The vibrac loans are not unusual but they are needed because we rely on TV money and match day which dry up in summer. If we can boost commercial revenues we deal with the credit risk and cash flow issues. A new stadium is not a panacea but it should help. Pushing this as a regeneration scheme may mean LCC can help us access lower cost funding than we can alone but at this stage that is just a hope not a fact.
I agree,
If it had of been in a prime location(closer to town) then I could half understand it.
The Deloitte figures are a bit out of date as based on older prices but they provide a fair benchmark.
You can work out roughly from prior year match day revenue, season ticket sales and quoted attendances how much we take per game for different groups of ticket e.g. Full price/early bird/ discounted adult season and single ticket, junior equivalents etc. Considerably more than half our ticket sales are at a substantial (20% minimum and for juniors/infants far more) discount to a single adult ticket price. I estimate this season our average per match take per fan will be nearer £25 than £30 including retail profits.
If you extrapolate this then a 7000-8000 attendance increase adds about £6m to revenue if you assume a significant proportion of increase is from boxes, exec/lounge seats etc. and a "fair pricing" policy to avoid price increases and maintain or even extend discounted options. Effectively the average take per new seat is assumed to be £40 factoring this all in.
Several PL teams in London significantly exceed £50 per fan meaning a 40k crowd for them would require us to sell >70k to match the revenue even in a new stadium assuming we get towards £30 per fan average.
The direct benefit of 10k extra capacity is marginal at best for us and still leaves us massively disadvantaged vs. London clubs and our Northern rivals with massive global fan bases and fly-in fans. If we are lucky we cover increased costs and interest/debt repayments with direct match day revenue.
So, this has to work on a second level by improving overall perception and visibility of the club to boost attractiveness to commercial partners and generate indirect revenue benefits. It does eliminate a key negative for a potential buyer/investor (it does not create a real positive differentiator unless it draws in hordes of new, largely overseas fans, by coinciding with playing success).
We do need better facilities and increased capacity but we must be realistic about the benefits.
(Before anyone asks, yes I am a qualified accountant and business executive so sorry about the numbers and realism!)
Thank you for the response, I understand that we have bridging loans due to cashflow. But, using Vibrac at a higher rate of interest then our usual creditors seems strange or desperate to me.
Would using a loan from Cayman or BVI have a tax arrangement advantage??