That's such a silly statement to make, for a number of reasons.
First of all 'KEIOC' didn't 'struggle to get any real support'. KEIOC successfully argued that the Kirkby stadium plans were deeply flawed, as proven at a public enquiry ordered by the Government, in which a judge ruled against letting the plans go ahead. The plans weren't sustainable in numerous ways, the biggest being that the finances simply did not add up. The whole point of 'KEIOC' - Keep Everton In Our City was as their name described. As a new stadium is now being planned IN OUR CITY, I would suggest that they have more than achieved their aim.
As for the Blue Union, if you cut through all the spin and all the baloney, the facts are this: they exposed how shabby Everton internal affairs were at that time, in summer 2011. Not so coincidentally, things have improved A LOT at the club since the summer of 2011. Why? Because many of the people at the centre of the much criticised stuff have since moved on and left the club. There was the supposed leaking of a Kenwright meeting transcript - no tape was ever found and it was always denied that the conversation was recorded. It was simply very proficient notes made. The marches before the games in 2011 came at a time when we hadn't signed a player on a permanent transfer for anything more than a nominal fee for TWO SEASONS. Again, things have changed greatly since then. The spin against the Blue Union was very prominent in the local media; the Echo refused point blank to cover many of the public meetings, and it was only when Neville Southall attended one at the Casa that they finally sent someone (Neil Jones). The numbers attending the marches before games was significant, yet was laughably dismissed as 'one man and his dog' by the likes of Sharp on the radio.
Again, facts - the Blue Union didn't just criticise, they made numerous suggestions as to how Everton could improve things. One was how the club markets itself to potential investors. 6 months after the Blue Union released their suggestions, Everton themselves adopted numerous aspects of what the Blue Union had been suggesting all along. So this idea that the Blue Union lot talked a load of nonsense without substance was utterly disproven - given that the club themselves quietly adopted many of their ideas.
And to top it all, the Blue Union has focused its' efforts of late on reducing ticket prices for fans and making matches more affordable. They have attended numerous rallies on London on the subject.
I am not affiliated in any way with the Blue Union, but a lot of the raw deal they get are from complete misconceptions regarding their views, aims, objectives and stances. They are just Evertonians like you and I, and care deeply about the club.
