Or Herzog & de Meuron along many other. Populous often get touted because of their work in English speaking countries.That's true but if that's the case why didn't we go for populous?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or Herzog & de Meuron along many other. Populous often get touted because of their work in English speaking countries.That's true but if that's the case why didn't we go for populous?
Just because you go below see level doesn't mean you can't still build up. Can give an architect more creative license to make something more spectacular and a stadium that blends in with the skyline and the skyscrapers, rather than look like that big stand that sticks out like a sore thumb and just looks ridiculous.Exactly....if was part below land level it would look pyar tosh in a world of skyscrapers.
Use the underneath as a car park instead.
Not getting at your opinion here but which infrastructure/ facilities do you fear we will skimp on?
Or Herzog & de Meuron along many other. Populous often get touted because of their work in English speaking countries.
Personally I like his designs and think they are innovative, I also admire the way he seems to get to know the fans perspective. Ultimately he will build to the brief Everton require of him.Sorry mate, I didn't really explain well enough.
Essentially, looking at the new Roma stadium for example, you can see straight from the outside into the ground/roof area. (taking away the fancy light graphics)
Where those gaps our in the stadium are were other modern stadia has corporate facilities or even a better concourse for fans when getting a drink at half time etc. This stadium is approximately $100m more than the cost of ours is set to be.
The same is seen on his other designs (some which weren't even built).
Are we looking to build a budget stadium?
Sorry mate, I didn't really explain well enough.
Essentially, looking at the new Roma stadium for example, you can see straight from the outside into the ground/roof area. (taking away the fancy light graphics)
Where those gaps our in the stadium are were other modern stadia has corporate facilities or even a better concourse for fans when getting a drink at half time etc. This stadium is approximately $100m more than the cost of ours is set to be.
The same is seen on his other designs (some which weren't even built).
Are we looking to build a budget stadium?
We are on a budget. This is not going to be one of those lavish state funded NFL stadiums costing north of 1bn. An Evertonised version of that Roma stadium on the docks would be a pretty good end result in my books. I don't think we need corporate facilities to the level that Spurs, Chelsea & Arsenal do. The focus needs to be on building a stadium that helps us maintain a home field advantage and based on the tweets from Meis he gets it.
I would be surprised if it is an open design given the location and exposure to the elements
Sorry mate, I didn't really explain well enough.
Essentially, looking at the new Roma stadium for example, you can see straight from the outside into the ground/roof area. (taking away the fancy light graphics)
Where those gaps our in the stadium are were other modern stadia has corporate facilities or even a better concourse for fans when getting a drink at half time etc. This stadium is approximately $100m more than the cost of ours is set to be.
The same is seen on his other designs (some which weren't even built).
Are we looking to build a budget stadium?
If half was below ground it would look half a stadium above ground.Just because you go below see level doesn't mean you can't still build up. Can give an architect more creative license to make something more spectacular and a stadium that blends in with the skyline and the skyscrapers, rather than look like that big stand that sticks out like a sore thumb and just looks ridiculous.
Hi mate. Could you put a link to where you found the stadium budget? Because i was under the impression that it hasnt been published.Sorry mate, I didn't really explain well enough.
Essentially, looking at the new Roma stadium for example, you can see straight from the outside into the ground/roof area. (taking away the fancy light graphics)
Where those gaps our in the stadium are were other modern stadia has corporate facilities or even a better concourse for fans when getting a drink at half time etc. This stadium is approximately $100m more than the cost of ours is set to be.
The same is seen on his other designs (some which weren't even built).
Are we looking to build a budget stadium?
Personally, I'd quite like the corporate finance those clubs will receive.
If half was below ground it would look half a stadium above ground.
I want to see Grandeur , an Iconic stadium that can be seen all along the mersey not something in the shadows of the skyscrapers around it.
Just look around our present ground ie Park end /Gwladys st...if it was part below surface it really would look miniscule and thats even in an area of terraced houses.
Part under the dock ?...not for me mate.
Hi mate. Could you put a link to where you found the stadium budget? Because i was under the impression that it hasnt been published.
Thanks in advance
It's also pretty widely acknowledged that £300m and 50,000 capacity are both jumping off points.Google it, £300m has been touted a few times for us now.