deipnosophist
Player Valuation: £80m
Another consideration: interest rates, which have been at historical lows for nearly a decade (post GFC), are on the rise...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, that is not what I am saying ......
Agreed.
But for it to go from one plan to another it suggests there was a reason for that and the reason - it would be obvious to conclude - is that there's not enough interest from private investors in this project to make a dent in financing the stadium.
Does it sound from what's been said by the club like we have investors taking this opportunity up?
Why would they not?Why would the club tell us about investors?
Sorry for the misunderstanding. What is it you are saying? As I understand it, by year 5, LCC would have amassed £35m for them to spend as they see fit.
Of course it's the cheapest option.No idea. Thing is, regardless of how rich you are you'd always go for the cheapest option. That's what this is. Who knows? If this plan goes tits up, Moshiri might take a more traditional route to secure a loan.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. What is it you are saying? As I understand it, by year 5, LCC would have amassed £35m for them to spend as they see fit.
At current rates of spending on the squad, servicing a debt to the tune of £15M per year represents about half our net spend. The point where we could see a tipping point in our favour from debt repayment to cash spinning operations would be a long time after 2022/23 that's for sure.
There's no way debt repayment wouldn't severely impact team quality.
It was a great idea to go for BMD. But we are not the club to see it to fruition. We cant carry that burden. That's something I've been concerned about for a while: that there's no commercial partner and that costs are going to go up and we'd be left with a very long period to pay off the debt, and that allows for the maximum amount of time-exposure to default.
The courageous thing to do now is to walk away.
But that wasn't the first option. The first option was to have the council set up a SPV to encourage private investors. Plan A was to effectively say to nervous potential investors "look, this is a belt and braces job here, you simply cant lose because the council stands behind this". To move onto Plan B underscores that those overtures to private investors were rebuffed....it's not an option for us anymore.No idea. Thing is, regardless of how rich you are you'd always go for the cheapest option. That's what this is. Who knows? If this plan goes tits up, Moshiri might take a more traditional route to secure a loan.
I state nothing of the kind. I simply advocate we cut our losses here and think again. That could be a GP refurbishment (which can be done - despite that idiot CEO's words on the matter), or to find another site with a commercial partner to soften the blow of paying for it.Stay at GP, is that it. Then what do we do for next heavens knows how many years. No way can GP be enlarged to get to the level of gate that you and others have arguing for - 60,000.
Typical of you Dave state something but not were it will lead to.
I state nothing of the kind. I simply advocate we cut our losses here and think again. That could be a GP refurbishment (which can be done - despite that idiot CEO's words on the matter), or to find another site with a commercial partner to soften the blow of paying for it.
But that wasn't the first option. The first option was to have the council set up a SPV to encourage private investors. Plan A was to effectively say to nervous potential investors "look, this is a belt and braces job here, you simply cant lose because the council stands behind this". To move onto Plan B underscores that those overtures to private investors were rebuffed....it's not an option for us anymore.