Yarrgh
Player Valuation: £70m
A few more weeks and he don't care because he's out the door.
Would the door be big enough for him , Woods ,Kenwright , FSA, Walsh , Shakespeare ,The urine drinker , and a few more to fit through .
Yarrgh
Player Valuation: £70m
We'll huff and puff until we get them out no matter how small the aperture.
Gareth Gibson
Player Valuation: £8m
We'll still be at Goodison in its current form when my newborn grandson is drawing out his old age pension.
Foot Long Hot Dog
Player Valuation: A packet of pork scratchings
4x 75 = 300, and the original figure quoted was errrmmmmm 300
Palace was in London last time I checked btw
Take them up to 30,000 feet, they'll all fit at the same time.
Dublin blue 75
Player Valuation: £50m
They first floated this 18 months ago, PP secured now and funding in place. BMD by comparison..
Penno
Player Valuation: £10m
The scale of the projects are massivley different though aren't they?
MickA
Player Valuation: £10m
I'd rather do planning correctly even if it takes longer....
https://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk...uring-sainsburys-store-unaware-crystal-876440
RobSpurs
Player Valuation: £2.5m
They got planning permission with unanimous approval, ergo they've done it correctly. Whatever problems there were with that slither of land have clearly been resolved since December, at least to the council's satisfaction. I don't suppose the Mayor will be minded to say no, so looks like it's full steam ahead.
But what you're doing is on a different scale. Hardly fair for some to use Palace as a yardstick when it comes to timing.
But what you're doing is on a different scale. Hardly fair for some to use Palace as a yardstick when it comes to timing.
I’ve been to palace for our last few games there.
I never realised it is an Dock full of water which they didn’t own till recently and was a world heritage site.
Their ground and BMD is like comparing apples and elephants
MickA
Player Valuation: £10m
The planning application has been recommended by the council.
This planning history is relevant in that the “Main Stand” is proposed to be expanded over a part of the Sainsbury’s car park and the club’s car park
which would facilitate required changes to the car parking layout and arrangements. Sainsbury has been served notice by the applicant (in view of ownership arrangements) and it is understood that the applicant is in detailed dialogue with the supermarket chain to ensure that the proposed alterations to the car parking and access arrangements are acceptable to both parties.
That, added to the fact they didnt even consult Sainsburys at the time of the press release stretches the assumption "they've done it correctly" in my view.
Anyway, as mentioned it's not a fair like-for-like comparison.
I'm surprised we haven't replaced the blue gravel with gravy granules