It's no different to when the club under Kenwright used credit facilities for transfer activity...that and player trading.
Reading the last esk blog he did a couple of days ago was like being transported back to about 5 or 6 years ago when we were in the thick of that regime's continual recourse to debt and sales.
Dave. I think the level of certainty and security you want is more suitable for somebody running a corner shop than a large complex company involving tens of millions of pounds each year.
Reading your posts it seems to me that the only situation that would satisfy is for Moshiri to continue to pump his own money into the club leaving it debt free... which is unrealistic or alternatively not to use the credit facilities available to the club and continue to limp along as we are passed out by other more ambitious clubs.
We have made mistakes with the appointments of Martinez and Koeman and Koeman in particular spent money badly, but one or two successes could help recoup most of the money lost... the sale of Pickford alone would have reduced the net loss of Koeman's trading enormously.
The spending this summer seems much more sensible and a player like Richarlison if he continues to impress could generate huge transfer fees in the future if he were to be sold.
Our neighbours have largely done what we are trying to do, but they have been far better at it.
I don't want to be following a club that limps along, telling ourselves about our great history, about our huge fanbase , our historic old ground while at the same time not being even close to sitting at football's top table.
If risks have to be taken, then take them, if an investor has to come in to support Moshiri, even a Russian oligarch, then so be it.
It isn't as if the game is exactly pristine clean as it is.
