Philljacobs
Player Valuation: £500k
Cant see the issue with this. If the club does well on the pitch and the demand is there then we will head towards 62k. If not, we wont. Seems pretty logical.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it will personally end up being 54/55k and the 52k was putting the feelers out.
I completely agree with that sentiment. However the industry has driven the cost of attendance up to make those examples you cite a happy anomoly. The enormous tv revenues and other commercial deals the PL clubs especially get, though, make it a CHOICE to stick to higher ticket prices more generally. The clubs could uniformly decide to peg prices back, but they wont. A football Task Force was set up under New Labour but failed to go with a radical minority report to deal with inflated prices for top flight games. But that's what we need: external intervention to regulate the game. If we dont get that, sure you'll have well meaning examples when clubs cant sell tickets for the full price where hundreds of tickets are sold cheap or given away free, but you wont get a proper structured solution.I think the issue is usually whether a club wants to fill a stadium with full paying fans, or try and create future fans:
Middlesborough built a stadium too big for the town and gave away tickets
West Ham have sold season tickets for about £3 a game to ensure they get people in
I'm sure Man City give away thousands of tickets
Everton seem to have taken a different view, and decided to go for a capacity that's correct without giving away tickets. Personally I think this is a mistake. There are thousands of people in Merseyside and the surrounding areas who can't get into the theme park in Anfield, priced out so that foreigners can get in and take photos of Klopp acting like a numpty on the sidelines. Everton would have had a real opportunity to get 60,000 people into the ground, but 10,000 of them probably wouldn't have been able to pay, certainly not to start with. Then again, it probably sums up modern football, more important to make sure that it has a glass tunnel club and a cheese room than getting a lot of "normal" fans in.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming Moshiri, I'd probably do the same in his shoes, but I do think it would have been a chance for Everton to truly become "The People's Club".
Could be Cincinnati FCs new stadium, too.
West Hams stadium is truly awful. I actually met the architect of the re-fit for west ham, and they have lots of chllenges to overcome in turning it into a stadium, but imo its horrible, the temporary stands they take in and out at the start and end of the season are truly awful.Don't want a ground anything like City or West Ham tbh. Completely soulless
Don't want a ground anything like City or West Ham tbh. Completely soulless
The graphics on the surface (err, ice) clearly indicate that it's been designed with ice hockey in mind.Cincinnati plans are on his website, it's not that.
Anyway, it's not a football stadium, NFL or proper football. Playing area way too narrow!
If I had to have a guess, I'd say it's an ice hockey arena.
e.g.
Its interesting looking comparatively at other teams grounds:
1. Manchester United 76,100
2. Arsenal 60,432
3. West Ham United 60,000
4. Manchester City 55,097
5. Liverpool 54,167
6. Newcastle 52.000
7. Chelsea 41,326
8. Everton 40,569
9. Middlesbrough 35,100
10. Southampton 32,689
11. Leicester City 32,500
12 .Tottenham 32,271
13. West Bromwich Albion 26,500
14. Stoke City 28,383
15. Crystal Palace 26,309
16. Hull City 25,404
17. Burnley 22,546
18. Watford 21,977
19. Swansea City 20,972
20. Bournemouth 11,464
Do we really need a stadium bigger then the Eithed and St James Park, ive been to both definitely not, in my opinion. Its nice to have the option and head room to go up as far as Arsenal if we ever needed to.
The graphics on the surface (err, ice) clearly indicate that it's been designed with ice hockey in mind.
Its interesting looking comparatively at other teams grounds:
1. Manchester United 76,100
2. Arsenal 60,432
3. West Ham United 60,000
4. Manchester City 55,097
5. Liverpool 54,167
6. Newcastle 52.000
7. Chelsea 41,326
8. Everton 40,569
9. Middlesbrough 35,100
10. Southampton 32,689
11. Leicester City 32,500
12 .Tottenham 32,271
13. West Bromwich Albion 26,500
14. Stoke City 28,383
15. Crystal Palace 26,309
16. Hull City 25,404
17. Burnley 22,546
18. Watford 21,977
19. Swansea City 20,972
20. Bournemouth 11,464
Do we really need a stadium bigger then the Eithed and St James Park, ive been to both and in my opinion definitely not.
Its nice to have the option and head room to go up as far as Arsenal if we ever needed to.