There's some interesting correlation between certain moaners with their heads on fire in this thread, and certain individuals lumpin' praise on the shoite in the witch hunt thread. I might draw a graph. They love stuff like that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was just that particular effort mein frandelinoOrlyfrandel is an A+ poster Frank.
The People's Forum: Whilst recognising the November document is not final
It IS broadly accurate as of that date changes are still happening but it is very revealing of direction of travel with more premium seats reduced stand rake narrower seats closer together for most fans reduced stand heights. Lots of factors at play including site complexity affordability...members.boardhost.com
If theres any truth in all this, it makes total sense, Spurs have seen costs spiral out of control and are looking at a bill close to 850m.
The smart move would be to hang fire a little and have a clearer vision, but sadly outside forces, such as a toxic fanbase mean it will probably be rushed and corners cut, which is a shame, but it is what it is.
As it is 500m was always on the short side for a Stadium in the location it is and if they had any sense they would probably just move to Stonecross and build a bigger stadium for 250m in the middle of wasteland!
Toxic fan base making the rush and cut corners..
Oh mate..
Absolutely not.Say the word frank and we can dance.
The Main Stand is nowhere near the height of St Lukes version. Doubt other stands will be either. Not going to be as impressive or intimidating as promised. Over promising & under delivering is a cardinal sin where football supporters are concerned
The Main Stand is nowhere near the height of St Lukes version. Doubt other stands will be either. Not going to be as impressive or intimidating as promised. Over promising & under delivering is a cardinal sin where football supporters are concerned
Yeah, I just took a look at the @EFCNewStadium twitter feed, and the plans from last year were similar, but more impressive. Its a shame that there has had to be compromise, for whatever reason.I've just found original images as they were in the Dan Meis workshop thread and yes the main stand is definitely a lot smaller than original plans. The top tier of the main stand is about 25% smaller than from the workshop.
I guess that's why they are just guides to show us though
You say this like you expected something other from the club, how long have you been supporting us
The scale of the stadium would have been clipped during the club's negotiations with UNESCO last summer in New York. The city's WHS was on the line and UNESCO wouldn't wear a stadium that has huge height or deviates too greatly from what's around it. The capacity and aesthetic takes a huge hit through that alone. The club are working within all this.