Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

New Everton Stadium

This is the least true thing that has ever been wrote on GOT.

Annoyingly LFC will bring in more tourist money then WHS ever will, so will Beatles heritage, along with things like the cruise terminal

The RS bring in so much when the glory hunters decide they support them and come to town to watch them on tv in a pub so fair play. Trip advisor had people from all over the world asking where to go.

A historic site is a historic site without WSH so people who want to see it will see it, doesnt need any accreditation. Not like that matters as BMD is a current wasteland next to a sewage plant, not like we're knocking down the Albert dock to build it.
 
Derby did the same. FFP as well. Allegedly etc. Barry Hearn, when he sold Orient (?) kept the ground in his pension fund, which meant they stayed viable even when they actually wernt really.

So it seems to be a last ditch attempt to keep important folk happy, rather than a "Good" idea. If that makes sense.

With us, assuming it goes to plan, I would guess that Everton owning the ground, debt notwithstanding, would be reflected in the valuation of us, ergo, Moshiri.
Didn't 'we' The Club already pay Peel £30M for a 200yrs lease on the site so 'we' The Club to all intents and purpose 'own' the site?
And if Moshiri ever manages to get 100% share control the He owns the site and any improvements...like a stadium...put on it.
Which would seem to be the gist of his long term plan anyway.
 

Didn't 'we' The Club already pay Peel £30M for a 200yrs lease on the site so 'we' The Club to all intents and purpose 'own' the site?
And if Moshiri ever manages to get 100% share control the He owns the site and any improvements...like a stadium...put on it.
Which would seem to be the gist of his long term plan anyway.

200 year lease subject to planning permission.

At pepper corn rent btw great business for us as the land value will boom after any local construction.
 
200 year lease subject to planning permission.

At pepper corn rent btw great business for us as the land value will boom after any local construction.
Any links to confim that last bit?

Leaseholders have a legal right under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to buy the freehold of their house if they meet certain qualifying criteria. Alternatively, it is possible to negotiate with the freeholder informally to buy the freehold by agreement.
Leaseholders have a legal right under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to buy the freehold of their house if they meet certain qualifying criteria. Alternatively, it is possible to negotiate with the freeholder informally to buy the freehold by agreement.

Informal route:

It is possible for leaseholders to informally approach the freeholder to try and acquire the freehold of their house by agreement. This is simply a matter of negotiation. There is no right to buy the freehold this way and consequently you cannot apply to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to determine any terms. However, depending on the nature of any agreement it may be enforceable through a County Court.

Formal Route:

The Act sets out a procedure and timescales to be followed to acquire the freehold. Under this route the Tribunal can determine the price and terms of acquisition if you fail to reach an agreement
Just sayin like
 
Last edited:

Any links to confim that last bit?

Leaseholders have a legal right under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to buy the freehold of their house if they meet certain qualifying criteria. Alternatively, it is possible to negotiate with the freeholder informally to buy the freehold by agreement.
Leaseholders have a legal right under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to buy the freehold of their house if they meet certain qualifying criteria. Alternatively, it is possible to negotiate with the freeholder informally to buy the freehold by agreement.

Informal route:

It is possible for leaseholders to informally approach the freeholder to try and acquire the freehold of their house by agreement. This is simply a matter of negotiation. There is no right to buy the freehold this way and consequently you cannot apply to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to determine any terms. However, depending on the nature of any agreement it may be enforceable through a County Court.

Formal Route:

The Act sets out a procedure and timescales to be followed to acquire the freehold. Under this route the Tribunal can determine the price and terms of acquisition if you fail to reach an agreement
Just sayin like
That’s just resi isn’t it? for Commercial property I would have thought the 54 Act applies?
 
I bet a very small % of people look up whether an area has WHS before deciding whether it's worth travelling there or not.

It would seem to me that Liverpool is a place that attracts that level of tourism based on lots of other factors, none of them being to do with WHS.
The Pier Head, the Albert Dock (including the Beatles Story), William Brown Street (World Museum/Picton Library/St Georges Hall), the Town Hall, Liverpool Rope Walks....

People come to Liverpool to see these buildings. They come also to go to Everton's old ground and Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields/Menlove Avenue etc too.

It's for the birds to say that WHS sites have no pulling power. Of course, many would come to see those buildings if Liverpool were off the WHS list. Many more wouldn't as most people see Liverpool as "Beatles City" and if they dont want to see that they'd swerve Liverpool.

The WHS adds to the footfall into Liverpool. No question.

It's pitiful that Evertonians are so desperate to get a stadium built they throw all reason out the window. I wouldn't mind, but it's a huge piss take anyway...as it always has been.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top