Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't apply to me. That's why I didn't respond.
It doesn't, because I dont think the club are simply conning us on this. I say they're grasping at straws to think they can make it happen and wasting everyone's time, and that is the basis of 'good people being fooled' on BMD.Sorry mate but it really does.
The Pier Head, the Albert Dock (including the Beatles Story), William Brown Street (World Museum/Picton Library/St Georges Hall), the Town Hall, Liverpool Rope Walks....
People come to Liverpool to see these buildings. They come also to go to Everton's old ground and Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields/Menlove Avenue etc too.
It's for the birds to say that WHS sites have no pulling power. Of course, many would come to see those buildings if Liverpool were off the WHS list. Many more wouldn't as most people see Liverpool as "Beatles City" and if they dont want to see that they'd swerve Liverpool.
The WHS adds to the footfall into Liverpool. No question.
It's pitiful that Evertonians are so desperate to get a stadium built they throw all reason out the window. I wouldn't mind, but it's a huge piss take anyway...as it always has been.
Yes, and as I stated - not everyone who visits England and wishes to tour outside London will be interested in the Beatles; there are plenty of tourists who simply wish to visit some of the country's historic and listed buildings...which outside London...Liverpool has most of.Strawberry Fields, Penny lane, Menlove Avenue, Beatles Museum, The entire 'Beatles city' is covered separately under the World heritage for music accreditation, which isn't at risk.
Sounds like you don't want our stadium in a run down rat infested site adjacent to a sewerage plant then Dave....Yes, and as I stated - not everyone who visits England and wishes to tour outside London will be interested in the Beatles; there are plenty of tourists who simply wish to visit some of the country's historic and listed buildings...which outside London...Liverpool has most of.
There is no comfort in telling ourselves that if WHS is rescinded then the tourist industry would be unaffected. It would be. There is no way the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce or Liverpool Vision or any other interested party will be happy with UNESCO taking Liverpool's name of their list of places to visit.
I think you're in a minority mate, of 99.99 %Of all the places I've visited around the UK and Europe for that mater, there hasn't been one I've visited because it's a WHS, not one.
Yes, and as I stated - not everyone who visits England and wishes to tour outside London will be interested in the Beatles; there are plenty of tourists who simply wish to visit some of the country's historic and listed buildings...which outside London...Liverpool has most of.
There is no comfort in telling ourselves that if WHS is rescinded then the tourist industry would be unaffected. It would be. There is no way the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce or Liverpool Vision or any other interested party will be happy with UNESCO taking Liverpool's name of their list of places to visit.
I'm no expert but I could've saved LCC a tidy sum of dosh.The city put together a task force last October (I think) to understand at a level as detailed as possible the impact of WHS on the city and therefore the cost of losing it. Would be interesting to see the output of that.
Yes, and as I stated - not everyone who visits England and wishes to tour outside London will be interested in the Beatles; there are plenty of tourists who simply wish to visit some of the country's historic and listed buildings...which outside London...Liverpool has most of.
There is no comfort in telling ourselves that if WHS is rescinded then the tourist industry would be unaffected. It would be. There is no way the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce or Liverpool Vision or any other interested party will be happy with UNESCO taking Liverpool's name of their list of places to visit.
So what is it you want, David? Do you want us to abandon BMD? I have a strong feeling if we did you would present that as a failure of the current board and ownership. Do you want to stay at Goodison? If so, how do we go about redevelopment? Kirkby was a shed next to Tesco, WHP will decimate local recreation spaces, Stonecross divorces us from our history etc, etc... Every option is wrong, according to you at least. What's the solution, David? We can't stay as we are, surely you accept that at least.The Pier Head, the Albert Dock (including the Beatles Story), William Brown Street (World Museum/Picton Library/St Georges Hall), the Town Hall, Liverpool Rope Walks....
People come to Liverpool to see these buildings. They come also to go to Everton's old ground and Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields/Menlove Avenue etc too.
It's for the birds to say that WHS sites have no pulling power. Of course, many would come to see those buildings if Liverpool were off the WHS list. Many more wouldn't as most people see Liverpool as "Beatles City" and if they dont want to see that they'd swerve Liverpool.
The WHS adds to the footfall into Liverpool. No question.
It's pitiful that Evertonians are so desperate to get a stadium built they throw all reason out the window. I wouldn't mind, but it's a huge piss take anyway...as it always has been.