I do believe he`s been infected with the Davekavirus and is a bit feverish.
I’m surprised Dave never thought of this angle tbh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do believe he`s been infected with the Davekavirus and is a bit feverish.
sorry pal, you're going to have to go on ignore for a while, too early for bed. This is pointless, tedious and disrupting a decent threadI think you are misunderstanding my argument. I've simply stated that the legislation, as applied today, would have to change because nobody would be interested in paying for a stadium that nobody would be allowed to attend.
No restrictions, no problem!
So if the plan goes ahead and the restrictions are removed, sound! But if there was a need to make use of that subsection that states the plan can be completely changed should it need to be, then that could be a problem. Hopefully that won't be the case, but I'm clearly not as confident in predicting the future as many other people are.
I do believe he`s been infected with the Davekavirus and is a bit feverish.
Farhad dressed as Tina Turner bellowing from the directors Box.Maybe they could have a higher death count in the Bramley Moore Thunder Dome to counter this ?
Maybe even introduce Ben - Hur chariot racing too.
Are you saying that a new stadium is never going to be built anywhere ever again just in case a wild coronavirus appears again in the future?
Farhad dressed as Tina Turner bellowing from the directors Box.
"Hi, good ebening everyone, and welcome to the USM Thunderdome"
You keep mentioning RAWK in your posts. Very strange behaviour. On the watch-list you go chummy.This is the RAWK response in a nutshell. I made a salient point about the impact that, y'know, bans from attending stadia may have on developments that will depend on stadium attendance, and then there's a mobbed response implying that I've claimed that there will never be any stadia built ever again.
This is the RAWK response in a nutshell. I made a salient point about the impact that, y'know, bans from attending stadia may have on developments that will depend on stadium attendance, and then there's a mobbed response implying that I've claimed that there will never be any stadia built ever again.
So from what I can gather so far, the stadium has been called in because covid is stopping people going into the overhanging tiers.
More importantly the project won't receive approval until @davek thinks up some more compelling wum arguments while @Dymak Fills in for him.
Did I miss anything?
God bless.
Yes. You're right. IF the present day coronavirus restrictions continued for the next 3 years, a new stadium project would be unviable.I agree with this. Nobody can see into the future and life is full of risk, but that doesn't mean you should never subject yourself to any risk. You couldn't do it even if you tried.
But your point about the 'best knowledge available' is a great one. At present, there is an outright ban on stadia attendance due to a novel coronavirus that apparently creates a new strain every two weeks. I simply made the point that a continuation of the present day coronavirus restrictions would make the project unviable. A 500 million pound stadium development is kind of reliant on people being able to attend the stadium.