Opens as a pdf ,just basically saying the club have to work with UU on every step of the procedure , submit method statement ,protection of assets etc. .Standard stuff.Can’t open it mate, what’s the summary?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Opens as a pdf ,just basically saying the club have to work with UU on every step of the procedure , submit method statement ,protection of assets etc. .Standard stuff.Can’t open it mate, what’s the summary?
That's true but for a commercial site it could still be a tidy sum. Some commercial ground rents are linked to the income generated by the site . I'm sure Moshiri & Co. will have got a good deal for the club.peppercorn rent isn't it?
Grow up, you tosser.that ur a slimeball buddy.
Thanks mate.Opens as a pdf ,just basically saying the club have to work with UU on every step of the procedure , submit method statement ,protection of assets etc. .Standard stuff.
it is a real sign of maturity to piss ur pants every time everton does not make u feel happy happy my buddy.Grow up, you tosser.
I suppose another real sign of maturity is being a multi account. But hey ho.it is a real sign of maturity to piss ur pants every time everton does not make u feel happy happy my buddy.
that ur a slimeball buddy.
Grow up, you tosser.
sorry buddy. i am now back on topic.Two warnings there for being off-topic.
C'mon, really keen the Everton forum is always on topic.
Can’t open it mate, what’s the summary?
hello buddy he cannot answer for a few days but i wanted to say thank u on his behalf for most useful addition to stadium thread discussion.Search public register records - MCMS
marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk
Case No. MLA/2020/00109
View attachment 125581
View attachment 125582
The correspondence in the category `Consultations` look like the objections from the bodies in the Planning Application....
Search public register records - MCMS
marinelicensing.marinemanagement.org.uk
Case No. MLA/2020/00109
View attachment 125581
View attachment 125582
The correspondence in the category `Consultations` look like the objections from the bodies in the Planning Application....
In the North-South config it is too tight to lower the pitch much, but in the original East-west one it would be ideal with the lower tier sitting in a cofferdamed space to protect against flooding. Which when there was some onus on planning height restrictions and construction costs might have been a good opportunity.
As regards roads accessing an underground carpark if there was to be one, these could be ramped down one level quite easily without needing to raise pitch level or damage the quayside at all.
The original multistorey car park probably disappeared on cost grounds tbh, and its omission was a post Meis ammendment I think, and not that dissimilar an elevation to the revised version (without the steps). Having spent a lot of time on our waterfront, and many others besides, I think it could've offered some much needed shelter at the exposed end of the site. The view on a warm day might have been ok (not sure the wirral waterfront is that exciting tbh), but how many of those are there for most of the football season?