New Everton Stadium

[SerenityNigh]

Our capacity now is not > 40,000 due to gradual reductions since 1994. It's in the region of 39,500. Eg. For safety reasons or disability sections.

And here was I assume 40,000 was in the region of 39,500. All my undergraduate background to waste now.

 

[bizzaro]

And here was I assume 40,000 was in the region of 39,500. All my undergraduate background to waste now.

In the region?

Like half of a thousand below?

 

[SerenityNigh]

In the region?

Like half of a thousand below?

 

[bring the ghost on]

And here was I assume 40,000 was in the region of 39,500. All my undergraduate background to waste now.

I'd be asking for your tuition fees back mate.

 

[bring the ghost on]

Like half of a thousand

Or as it's more commonly referred to - five hundred.

 

[SerenityNigh]

I'd be asking for your tuition fees back mate.

Plus interest! Add it all up and that's... some significant digits!

 

[bring the ghost on]

Plus interest! Add it all up and that's... some significant digits!

Indeed - best not to try work out the exact figure though, you might end up half of a thousand below again.

 

[nsno-chris]

In the region?

Like half of a thousand below?

I'd class a 1% reduction as "in the region of"

 

[nsno-chris]

He's unreal sometimes

 

[SerenityNigh]

I'd class a 1% reduction as "in the region of"

1.25%, don't cut him short

 

[larbert toffee]

Yes. 39500

Just to reaffirm it ....oh no look out Rachel Riley our continuing pleasure maybe interrupted by a new kid on the block....

 

[Kiwi]

And here was I assume 40,000 was in the region of 39,500. All my undergraduate background to waste now.

WAT?
Clearly gone to waste

 

[SerenityNigh]

WAT?
Clearly gone to waste

Me never were good at the Englilsh papers

 

[Lee Smith]

I wasn't suggesting it is, just showing a new stadium - pleased you now accept that a 55-56,000 seat stadium is big enough though (42,000 x 1.3)

I've got WAY too much respect for The Esk and his command for numbers to point out his over sight that 33% is x 1.33, not x 1.3. So I won't

 

[bizzaro]

I've got WAY too much respect for The Esk and his command for numbers to point out his over sight that 33% is x 1.33, not x 1.3. So I won't

Don't worry mate. He's already agreed to up it to 40%

Bigger is better for us.