Lobster Johnson
Player Valuation: £35m
Was it bollocks, it was a hit piece by a local hack.
You haven't read it Dave and you know you haven't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was it bollocks, it was a hit piece by a local hack.
It already addressed it.It’s a good listen, and valid points raised.
I’m sure the club will include the history of the site and John Bramley-Moore’s past in some way.
I've just listened to that Podcast. I think I know what's in the article.You haven't read it Dave and you know you haven't.
I've just listened to that Podcast. I think I know what's in the article.
It's just a piece that doesn't know what it's trying to say. It's fine opening people's eyes to the history of the site on which the stadium is being built, people need to know at the end of the day and learn about it
But you weave in stuff about "Merseyside's historic issues with racism" and then only use two examples which relate Everton, it's a bit agenda-y
I still am. But in a constructive way, not as a 'kin Kopite looking to do a hit piece to damage the club.And the podcast didn't mention any of those 80s incidents from the article or beat up on Everton at all.
You were banging this drum for about 6 months...
I still am. But in a constructive way, not as a 'kin Kopite looking to do a hit piece to damage the club.
Clueless and naive in equal measure.I don't know how you'd take that from the podcast or the article. Which you haven't read. You're playing the man not the ball.
Hughes may be a kopite but his book on the social history of the city is pretty good and I thought he handled the different voices in the story today with nuance. Happy for you to disagree, but you should probably listen to or read the story first.
That's a major reason for it yes.Yeah, as soon as I saw his name attached to it I figured his goal was stirring the pot.
No idea why the Athletic chose a kopite for the piece rather than the two Everton reporters. (actually, I do. their having a relatively poor season so need to point score over Everton who they're "not bothered about")
Clueless and naive in equal measure.
It was the biggest snide piece by that lot in a long time.
The little matter of leaving out a club statement addressing the matter of slavery. The comments about an Everton banner commemorating black players that wouldn't have been the case 30/40 years ago (isolating Everton as special case back then when racism was rife). Name checking Everton again in relation to a (unspecified and recent) racist issue.Which bits of the podcast that you definitely listened to, did you think were especially snide?
You haven't read it Dave and you know you haven't.
Tried to read it
Gave up after a certain point
I wouldn't call it a full on "hit piece" or anything like that but I'm not sure it was written in good faith due to who wrote it, and that's going to be hard for a lot of people to shake
If one of the Everton lads at The Athletic had written it then maybe I'd think differently
I made my way through it, and whilst it was well researched he just couldn't help himself and had to get a couple of digs in.Tried to read it
Gave up after a certain point
I wouldn't call it a full on "hit piece" or anything like that but I'm not sure it was written in good faith due to who wrote it, and that's going to be hard for a lot of people to shake
Focusing on racism in football on Merseyside like it was only an Everton issue didn't really strike me as fair to be honest and that's when I checked out
If one of the Everton lads at The Athletic had written it then maybe I'd think differently
It's just a piece that doesn't know what it's trying to say. It's fine opening people's eyes to the history of the site on which the stadium is being built, people need to know at the end of the day and learn about it
But you weave in stuff about "Merseyside's historic issues with racism" and then only use two examples which relate Everton, it's a bit agenda-y