Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

New Everton Stadium

My assumption is the other way around. The club wanted a big home end...but that takes up more horizontal space than a normal stand and the site is constrained N-S. So the small stand is the compromise for having the big home end.
If you keep the roof more or less the same height all round, you're obviously then left with a load of space at the back of the small stand. So my guess is Meis thought 'why not stick a huge screen there?'
For some reason, in later iterations that was replaced by the (WHL style!) screens at each end instead.

But the point is, I'm pretty sure the "biggest screen in Europe" was something that emerged from the necessary compromise in the layout.
It was not the cause of it - that was the big home end combined with the site constraints
This was the earlier plan for the North Stand from autumn 2020....


Screen Shot 2023-03-23 at 17.41.34.png
 
Was there for a friendly years back 4 nil win IIRC.

Was freezing that night.

I was there myself. Tried to get shelter on the sea-side of the ground as on the oppposite side the wind blows straight into your face.

Lovely club though - Joe Bollard a legendary Bray fan and a fanatical Evertonian too.
 

My assumption is the other way around. The club wanted a big home end...but that takes up more horizontal space than a normal stand and the site is constrained N-S. So the small stand is the compromise for having the big home end.

If you keep the roof more or less the same height all round, you're obviously then left with a load of space at the back of the small stand. So my guess is Meis thought 'why not stick a huge screen there?'

For some reason, in later iterations that was replaced by the (WHL style!) screens at each end instead.

But the point is, I'm pretty sure the "biggest screen in Europe" was something that emerged from the necessary compromise in the layout. It was not the cause of it - that was the big home end combined with the site constraints

The screens are the same size both ends so the dip has nothing to do with it. They sit in front of the roof structure.

As you say to create a bigger home end they had to sacrifice the other.
 
Pardon my ignorance, but a big pit for what purpose?
They need a storage area for grey water, drainage, etc, for times when the flow rate is too much to go wherever the hell it is going. A buffer sort of situation. I think this one is for the water treatment works as it's on that side. I'll try to find the video I saw on it.

(Assuming that's what it is. I could be completely wrong)
 
My assumption is the other way around. The club wanted a big home end...but that takes up more horizontal space than a normal stand and the site is constrained N-S. So the small stand is the compromise for having the big home end.

If you keep the roof more or less the same height all round, you're obviously then left with a load of space at the back of the small stand. So my guess is Meis thought 'why not stick a huge screen there?'

For some reason, in later iterations that was replaced by the (WHL style!) screens at each end instead.

But the point is, I'm pretty sure the "biggest screen in Europe" was something that emerged from the necessary compromise in the layout. It was not the cause of it - that was the big home end combined with the site constraints

Spot on.
 
They need a storage area for grey water, drainage, etc, for times when the flow rate is too much to go wherever the hell it is going. A buffer sort of situation. I think this one is for the water treatment works as it's on that side. I'll try to find the video I saw on it.

(Assuming that's what it is. I could be completely wrong)
 

My assumption is the other way around. The club wanted a big home end...but that takes up more horizontal space than a normal stand and the site is constrained N-S. So the small stand is the compromise for having the big home end.

If you keep the roof more or less the same height all round, you're obviously then left with a load of space at the back of the small stand. So my guess is Meis thought 'why not stick a huge screen there?'

For some reason, in later iterations that was replaced by the (WHL style!) screens at each end instead.

But the point is, I'm pretty sure the "biggest screen in Europe" was something that emerged from the necessary compromise in the layout. It was not the cause of it - that was the big home end combined with the site constraints

could be worse, could have ended up with a blue emirates with a jarg Marseille stand and half the faculties for NFL.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top