BullensRoad
Player Valuation: £25m
No, I didn't because I could see it for it was. I hated Kenwright and couldn't wait to see the back of him.
Well, I've asked you numerous times to nail your colours to the mast and you keep skirting around the issue. If the wall doesn't obscure the view of the pitch then what is the problem!? There are plenty of seats in the stadium where you won't be able to see other parts, the same in every other stadium around the world. Regardless of how they dealt with the transition in that corner you would still have the same issue, a small minority of supporters would be able to see the pitch but not a section of the South stand.
So because this arrangement hasn't (allegedly) been introduced in another stadium then that makes it wrong? I don't know the reasons for taking this approach (and neither do you) but it is clear that a a number of alternatives have been considered and for whatever reason this is what has been taken forward.
Does it matter whether they were involved in the sight line modelling or not? They wouldn't state it for the world to see, and neither woudl the club, if it was untrue. Regardless, you appear to be agreeing with me that there won't be any obstructed views of the pitch, so again, what are you complaining for?
The image you are talking about, which I have tried to find, was a picture someone had taken from the very rear of the away section earlier on in the construction process; something similar to the below.
View attachment 270894
As i recall, there was a bulk head or similar above (with a sticker on) which restricted the view slightly, similar to sitting in the Bullens and looking through a letter box. However, there was no context to this in terms of whether that actually formed an area where the seats would be; looked like it was taken from the concourse IMO. So, yet again no concrete evidence that there are any restricted views in the stadium.
That picture confirms it for me. No chance they’re restricted.