tommye
Player Valuation: £100m
Ftfy too mateHe's a bellend
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ftfy too mateHe's a bellend
I think from the outside it is comfortably the best in terms of the way it looks and the setting. It’s spectacular. Hopefully the atmosphere inside will match it.No his not…….
Saying he is doesn’t make him so
Anyway rival fans are just jealous, it will be one of the top grounds in the country
They're getting worried now.
They all know how big a club Everton are.
They can't point and laugh at us anymore.
They can't claim the new ground is just a pipe dream.
They can see it growing every day into our new home that they'll all envy.
They know already what it stands for.
They know that the stadium plus this pending takeover could be the kick up the arse we've needed for the best part of 30 yrs and they're worried.
They know what a successful Everton mean and they're scared.
They're shitting themselves that we reclaim our place at the top of the game and push their little piss ant clubs back beneath us where they belong.
Also, I'd say there's a lot to be done by the club after LOR hand the keys over.100%. Seems to have been an uptick in people finding fault with the inside but the inside of a ground is meant to be seen and experienced full of fans, without fans like any other stadium in the world it’s just some seats facing some grass.
The real aesthetic part is the outside and for me anyway it looks absolutely stunning.
For me, Stadia aesthetics and performance should always be judged on the internal arrangement of tiers etc. The external facade or detailing has no affect on the performance of the stadium as a viewing platform, or in terms of atmosphere enhancement, weather protection etc. That's why many of the world's greatest stadia are quite austere to the point of being plain or even bland on the outside. It's also why most fans can more readily identify most stadia by their internal views, than their exteriors (with a few obvious exceptions).100%. Seems to have been an uptick in people finding fault with the inside but the inside of a ground is meant to be seen and experienced full of fans, without fans like any other stadium in the world it’s just some seats facing some grass.
The real aesthetic part is the outside and for me anyway it looks absolutely stunning.
This is the section submitted for planning. There is very little difference between the upper and lower South.It'll be interesting to find out. I'd be surprised if they go against the green guide because you have all the safety advisory groups who issue the licenses. So I'm still going to for 25 on the lower and 34 on the upper but I'm not as certain as was earlier!
I remember someone on here showing a pic of the cross section. and someone mentioned the height of the riser too. I'm not going through 7500 pages to find it though!
I've just crudely checked it and the lower is around 30-32 degrees and upper 34 degreesThis is the section submitted for planning. There is very little difference between the upper and lower South.
The max steepness according to the Design & Access Statement is 35 degrees which i expect applies to all the upper tiers with the lower tiers varying.
View attachment 274756
For me, Stadia aesthetics and performance should always be judged on the internal arrangement of tiers etc. The external facade or detailing has no affect on the performance of the stadium as a viewing platform, or in terms of atmosphere enhancement, weather protection etc. That's why many of the world's greatest stadia are quite austere to the point of being plain or even bland on the outside. It's also why most fans can more readily identify most stadia by their internal views, than their exteriors (with a few obvious exceptions).
Of course, if multi-functionality is another factor, then things such as moving pitches, or closing roofs, back-of-house facilities etc will all come into it.
Best stadium in the champions league!Home advantage could be crucial.
Upon closer inspection, that section suggests the lower stand varies from 26 degrees through to 34 degrees!I've just crudely checked it and the lower is around 30-32 degrees and upper 34 degrees
Upon closer inspection, that section suggests the lower stand varies from 26 degrees through to 34 degrees!
red=26 degrees, blue=28 degrees, green=30 degrees, orange=34 degrees
So that clears that one up
View attachment 274758
For comparison, that's what a constant 34 degrees looks like.There's a video ( I tried to find it today and I think it was a @Noggsy blue video) and he got completely side on with the structure (this was even when the bottom half of the lower structure hadn't been fitted yet) and you could really see a gradient change.
That's great that you've found that ARJ as it shows the curvature of the lower tier.
For comparison, that's what a constant 34 degrees looks like.
*edit* and 25 degrees added below
View attachment 274761