Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Next manager discussion (poll reset 21/05/2016)

Who would you want?

  • Frank de Boer

    Votes: 302 17.0%
  • David Moyes

    Votes: 56 3.2%
  • Manuel Pellegrini

    Votes: 152 8.6%
  • Ronald Koeman

    Votes: 286 16.1%
  • Other (please state below)

    Votes: 109 6.1%
  • Unai Emery

    Votes: 870 49.0%

  • Total voters
    1,775
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of those mentioned the most, their overall records look like this, obviously some can be misleading given some of the teams they've managed but overall:

In order of games managed:

Benitez managed 969 - win rate 51%
Mourinho managed 765 - win rate: 66%
Koeman managed 603 - win rate 55%
Pellegrini managed 600 - win rate: 52%
Low managed 337 - win rate: 54%
Villas Boas managed 298 - win rate 60%
Pereira managed 276 - win rate: 60%
De Boer managed 261 - win rate: 60%
Cocu managed 148 - win rate: 67%


And just for the record:

Moyes managed 845 - win rate 44%
Hughes managed 515 - win rate: 39.6%
Howe managed 373 - win rate 47%
 
Going on win rates alone, Pellegrini would be the worse of the best but given he's managed almost double what Low, Villas Boas, Pereira, De Boer and Cocu have - it's hard to compare but still interesting to see.

Jose is in a league of his in comparison to the rest of them, I just can't get my head around why anyone wouldn't have him as our manager...

Koeman's record is better than I thought too.
 
Going on win rates alone, Pellegrini would be the worse of the best but given he's managed almost double what Low, Villas Boas, Pereira, De Boer and Cocu have - it's hard to compare but still interesting to see.

Jose is in a league of his in comparison to the rest of them, I just can't get my head around why anyone wouldn't have him as our manager...

Koeman's record is better than I thought too.
Koemans is based on a Mickey Mouse league though
 


Of those mentioned the most, their overall records look like this, obviously some can be misleading given some of the teams they've managed but overall:

In order of games managed:

Benitez managed 969 - win rate 51%
Mourinho managed 765 - win rate: 66%
Koeman managed 603 - win rate 55%
Pellegrini managed 600 - win rate: 52%
Low managed 337 - win rate: 54%
Villas Boas managed 298 - win rate 60%
Pereira managed 276 - win rate: 60%
De Boer managed 261 - win rate: 60%
Cocu managed 148 - win rate: 67%


And just for the record:

Moyes managed 845 - win rate 44%
Hughes managed 515 - win rate: 39.6%
Howe managed 373 - win rate 47%

As you say, lot of those win rates in the top column are to be expected really, as the managers named have been in charge of clubs expected to do well in their respective leagues and with a bit of a financial advantage.

That said, it would be nice for a change to have a manager with a decent record.
 
Of those mentioned the most, their overall records look like this, obviously some can be misleading given some of the teams they've managed but overall:

In order of games managed:

Benitez managed 969 - win rate 51%
Mourinho managed 765 - win rate: 66%
Koeman managed 603 - win rate 55%
Pellegrini managed 600 - win rate: 52%
Low managed 337 - win rate: 54%
Villas Boas managed 298 - win rate 60%
Pereira managed 276 - win rate: 60%
De Boer managed 261 - win rate: 60%
Cocu managed 148 - win rate: 67%


And just for the record:

Moyes managed 845 - win rate 44%
Hughes managed 515 - win rate: 39.6%
Howe managed 373 - win rate 47%


Philip Cocu it is then based on that
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top