Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Transfer Rumour Olivier Giroud

Status
Not open for further replies.
bluestevon said:
Sell Lukaku - Buy Giroud for 20m, another young striker with massive potential for 25-30m, Sandro for 5m and a top winger for around 30m.

That team would suit the managers style and system better - because frankly Lukaku doesn't suit him at all, and overall financially it makes sense also

Which much as yopu say it doesn't matter, it does mate and always will - otherwise why have chelsea sold about 170m worth of players over the last year
Click to expand...
Chelsea have too many players their books - didn't they have thirty or so players out on loan a while ago?
We still don't have enough quality players in the squad.
 
Stan Lee Park said:
Chelsea have too many players their books - didn't they have thirty or so players out on loan a while ago?
We still don't have enough quality players in the squad.
Click to expand...

It's Chelseas business model to do this mate. They buy lots of young players and farm them out - seeing their value increase and sell a huge amount of them, making huge profits on most of them and very very little risk - by the time they sell most the loan fees have basically covered already the original purchase price.

BTW this is a model we could very well be looking at following to a degree
 

bluestevon said:
It's Chelseas business model to do this mate. They buy lots of young players and farm them out - seeing their value increase and sell a huge amount of them, making huge profits on most of them and very very little risk - by the time they sell most the loan fees have basically covered already the original purchase price.

BTW this is a model we could very well be looking at following to a degree
Click to expand...
I think you may be right on us following the Chelsea model, but it has proved a bit hit and miss for Chelsea in that they have not dominated competitions in the way that Man U did twenty years ago. Also, they do let some excellent players go - like Lukaku for instance.
 
Stan Lee Park said:
I think you may be right on us following the Chelsea model, but it has proved a bit hit and miss for Chelsea in that they have not dominated competitions in the way that Man U did twenty years ago. Also, they do let some excellent players go - like Lukaku for instance.
Click to expand...

Would argue when united dominated it was easier with less competition at the very top, also United for want of a better word got lucky in producing Neville, Scholes, Giggs, Beckham all within a year or two of each other - 4 world class players in their positions for nothing effectively, they also produced 3-4 good quality squad players like Butt, Neville, Sharpe around the same time, which made such a massive difference

No footy model is perfect but having one which ultimately is self sustainable is the best long term
 
Im on the fence about Giroud, he is a proven PL goal scorer, but he is pretty hot and cold for me, a bit one dimensional, think he would struggle a bit to break with pace and has a limited shelf life, it would be a 2-3 year solution. He would be one of a couple of signings to my mind.
 
Last edited:
I find it hard to equivocally state I don't want this or that player to come to us, as I might end up cheering them when they turn out for us.

I think the only exception I have ever made to this was Barton.

I don't really want Giroud but I'd support him if he was ours.
 

I can't really understand why he's been on the bench so much for Arsenal. Nearly every time he plays/comes on he scores

is it accommodate Sanchez better? Are arsenal trying to play a row of attacking midfielders and no centre forward?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register
Back
Top