Why are you moving the goal posts here?
You misrepresented my words to suggest I said 'LCC should be financing the improvements' > I correct you on it > you dont acknowledge that correction; then you drag this topic back to where it no longer resides: you setting up a straw man concerning the absence of any 'legal documentation' whereby Everton had LCC on the hook for infrastructure improvements.
That's never been my contestation and there is no need for that proof (or lack of) to address which institution is at fault here.
The fundamental issue now is why you're determined to stand in front of the local state and deflect all reasonable criticism they are getting over fans getting access to the new stadium...in particular, you've studiously avoided the overwhelmingly sustainable criticism I'm making that if they (LCC) couldn't safeguard events taking place at the stadium then they - as the governing authority - had no right to pass the P.A. for it and the stadium should not have been built.
I keep on saying here...and I keep on being right about it...all roads lead to the local state; they are responsible for handing the green light to a clearly chaotic and unachievable transport plan, so they are responsible for getting us out of it....which I think is the conclusion that the ludicrous Kirkby brickie has come to, hence his belated conversion to a glider scheme.
For some reason that I'm not aware you've decided you'll ignore the blindingly obvious hierarchy of responsibility in the delivery of this stadium and any failures that have resulted from it.
