2024/25 Sean Dyche

[ChesterBlue]

Who's sacking him and where we getting circa £8mill to do so?

Why would it cost 8mil? I thought he was only contracted to the end of this season?

 

[windymiller]

Who's sacking him and where we getting circa £8mill to do so?

You don't pay the £8m up front in one lump sum, he'll just continue to get his ridiculous salary for the next year and a half. You're right about the nobody to sack him bit, though. Unfortunately.

 

[Stuartisitc1878]

Why would it cost 8mil? I thought he was only contracted to the end of this season?

according to the Bobble, he has a clause in his contract

 

[windymiller]

Why would it cost 8mil? I thought he was only contracted to the end of this season?

He's apparently got a clause in his contract that he gets an extra year's salary if he's sacked. We really are useless at the business side of things.

 

[Eggs]

The dalek talking ginger fraud who brought off our only striker for a 39 year old is the problem.

….its a bit of a nonsense point you make, you make it sound like Young replaced Beto up front.

If you watched the game you’d sure have noticed how we were increasingly open on our defensive left side. McNeil was poor against Cornet in the first half but he may as well not been there in the 2nd, they were walking through him. Dyche had to replace McNeil and Young’s introduction certainly improved us defensively.

Hopefully you noticed Ndiaye was the one who replaced Beto as central striker. An attacking axis of Ndiaye, Lindstrom, McNeil and Harrison finished the game. The type of players posters have been calling on Dyche to play, hardly conforming to hoofball. There is a discussion whether we’d have been better had Beto remained on the pitch but the replacement of Young at LB was clearly needed.

Regardless of all the ante-Young furor, I’ve not heard anybody suggest a better back-up LB option available to Dyche. He shouldn’t be near the side but sadly he’s the best Dyche has, the contrast was clear with McNeil last night.

Perhaps it’s more to do with recruitment than Dyche and Young.

 

[Curtis]

If the the world was a just place his salary should be seized and provided to the fans who paid to watch his defeatist turgid football as compensation

 

[ChesterBlue]

He's apparently got a clause in his contract that he gets an extra year's salary if he's sacked. We really are useless at the business side of things.

Can’t we just sack him for gross misconduct for when he slapped Patterson and pay him nothing?

 

[Professor Toffee]

according to the Bobble, he has a clause in his contract

Must have put the clause in cos he knows he's s*it and he seems to be pushing for the sack

 

[windymiller]

Can’t we just sack him for gross misconduct for when he slapped Patterson and pay him nothing?

Maybe if we'd sacked him back then, I'm not sure an employment tribunal would accept that as just cause several months later!

 

[Saaby]

Hopefully we can somehow stay up and then get rid of him.

 

[ChesterBlue]

Maybe if we'd sacked him back then, I'm not sure an employment tribunal would accept that as just cause several months later!

I don’t know - could say an internal investigation has only just been concluded or something

 

[windymiller]

Must have put the clause in cos he knows he's s*it and he seems to be pushing for the sack

I've seen a few people suggest this but I think it's probably not the case. Sean Dyche has just reached the end of where his one tactic can take us. He's rubbish and we should jib him off immediately.

 

[windymiller]

I don’t know - could say an internal investigation has only just been concluded or something

Would be nice but we all know he'll be getting his £8m.

 

[Mozza1987]

….its a bit of a nonsense point you make, you make it sound like Young replaced Beto up front.

If you watched the game you’d sure have noticed how we were increasingly open on our defensive left side. McNeil was poor against Cornet in the first half but he may as well not been there in the 2nd, they were walking through him. Dyche had to replace McNeil and Young’s introduction certainly improved us defensively.

Hopefully you noticed Ndiaye was the one who replaced Beto as central striker. An attacking axis of Ndiaye, Lindstrom, McNeil and Harrison finished the game. The type of players posters have been calling on Dyche to play, hardly conforming to hoofball. There is a discussion whether we’d have been better had Beto remained on the pitch but the replacement of Young at LB was clearly needed.

Regardless of all the ante-Young furor, I’ve not heard anybody suggest a better back-up LB option available to Dyche. He shouldn’t be near the side but sadly he’s the best Dyche has, the contrast was clear with McNeil last night.

Perhaps it’s more to do with recruitment than Dyche and Young.

It was a dreadful sub. It left Ndiaye our best creative player stuck up front and out of the game. Beto coming off for Young was 100% not the right change and I think that's why the boos were even louder. He can bring Young on to play left back, just don't take off your only recognised striker for it.

 

[ChesterBlue]

Would be nice but we all know he'll be getting his £8m.

Whoever gave him that clause is a monumental tit