ijjysmith
Calm
We'll see
Of course. But perhaps let your weird obsession with a player that has never has anything to do with Everton should die now (especially now he's at a rival) and you should support the player we do have.
We'll see
Player or bus mate ?
Oh ok. You say it is so it must be.
Or get a temp in I.E. a loan and try again for John. You wouldn't leave the position empty.
Wait and see? We saw what he can offer last season. It wasn't a chicken running about with no head. He galvanised Everton in the second half of that hideous campaign.Headless chicken...wait and see.
A simple yes or no - did Martinez identify the need for a playmaker?
Another one - did Everton fail to sign a playmaker this window?
If the answer the above is yes and yes, Everton have messed up.
You could want to sign Messi every window, but if he's not available you don't just refuse to sign any attackers whatsoever.
What's that sailing over your head?
Down to Martinez not to have prioritized a playmaker. It's down to the board to have made him decide between a CB (also desperately needed) and a playmaker.
There should have been cash for both and then some.
I really hope Stones doesn't take a nosedive (from average defensive qualities to week in, week out glaring errors) or the decision to keep him will look like the balls up of the decade.
I'd have punted him as soon as Chelsea got near £30M. That cash plus the money spent would have reinvigorated the squad with quality.
Still, most wanted him kept, so the manager of even board cant be blamed for caving into that.
We don't.
Fair points but we're not the only ones in this situation. Chelsea for all their wealth, put all their eggs in John Stones' basket it seems and they've ended up signing a dubious looking centre half for a couple of million.Again, it is.
OK, imagine it was a business who have account managers.
You identify you need a new manager for a new account, but that highly rated guy named John from a rival company isn't available.
So you go, "oh well, let's not get any account manager for that account."
Doesn't make sense. Players are assets. Yarmolenko would have been an identified asset, who had qualities to fill an identified role.
But if you have identified the need for that role, you don't put all your eggs in one basket. No business would do that.
Everton seemingly did, or we missed out on three or four others - which would make us incompetent.
So after identifying a business need and failing to fill it, which will impact our business model for at the very least the next six months, we're either stupid, incompetent, or both.