Answered your own homework there on city chief. We don’t matter - they want us out of the league so we’re no longer the PLs problem.
City have actually had less penalties than Chelsea and the mighty pedz, but you tell yourself whatever, and I’m not sure the other pens were as controversial as the one against us - definitely less controversial than the gifts of pens the pedz and United keep getting.
Again, you’ve kinda answered the question about wham/sheff united - a draw in that game is a great result for both ends of their table and their “product” - they want the relegation drama to drag on as long as possible, whilst nicely stopping wham from getting further away from United and Chelsea.
Not giving two stonewall penalties to wham would have looked dodgy as, and how can they not upgrade that challenge to a red, for whatever reason - they shouldn’t have needed VAR to call it a red ffs.
They use subjectivity and this clear and obvious nonsense as a smokescreen that some like yourself seem to buy.
The real question you need to ask is why didn’t Var get involved on the second foul in the box on Bowen, when it’s one of the most stonewall penalties you will ever see?! Clear and obvious what?
It’s not inconsistency or bias, it’s corruption, the bad calls against certain teams are far too consistent for that.