So upon appeal, the IC have referred to EFL guidelines and suggested a 'positive trend' in our finances.
So, with regards to our second charge, you would imagine this would put us in a 'strong' position... EFL guidelines do not allow double jeopardy and you would imagine the 3rd years' accounts added on are healthier than the 1st which has now dropped off owing to the 3 year cycle thing.
Maybe wishful thinking, but any further punishments shouldn't be any more than 1 or 2 points. Maybe suspended? Maybe a financial punishment instead?
Forest must be concerned. I don;t know what their apparent breach is compared to ours, but you would imagine it is significant considering their spending.
We're effectively 6 points outside the relegation zone and 2 ahead of Forest (taking GD into account).
Assuming no ridiculous uptick in form for either Luton or Forest, another 10 points and we're safe IMO.