That's all only because there were three worse teams lad.
but it was
That's all only because there were three worse teams lad.
No, because he was our best midfielder but Dyche hated having to play him, and he didn't whenever possible.
Also "loads of times" in the previous post is a hilarious statement considering he's been above 15th twice, but ok.
Never said any different about Onana. But it wouldn’t matter if dyche had Lampard ans scholes in his midfield. The way he sets up and played, meant good players are irrelevant and that’s why half the squad hated him including Onana.So you finally admit the club did sell his best midfielder then. We then replaced him with a kid from Aston Villa who had barely played in the league, who then got crocked for most of the season, whilst Garner was also crocked
Never said any different about Onana. But it wouldn’t matter if dyche had Lampard ans scholes in his midfield. The way he sets up and played, meant good players are irrelevant and that’s why half the squad hated him including Onana.
I'm a bit confused at to how he 'did very good' (5 wins, 6 draws and 7 losses in 18 games) whilst with respect to Moyes (4 wins, 5 draws and 1 loss in 10) you said 'Those four wins I thought he was lucky'.Yes I wondered about that but 21points was still very good from the position he started from. You are still comparing him to Moyes I’m not I’m just waiting to see how he does in the future. What else have I added out of thin air—- you seem to be the one getting upset, again, over my responses to Dyche articles!
And I think you’re obsessed with Moyes in a totally different way, you seem to be desperate to write off everything he ever achieved here while at the same time wanting to make the former manager out to be some sort of saviour.
Both of their respective careers will speak for themselves at the end of the day. Moyes is still managing in the Premier League and the Talksport Tit is hosting a radio show. Levels.
I'm a bit confused at to how he 'did very good' (5 wins, 6 draws and 7 losses in 18 games) whilst with respect to Moyes (4 wins, 5 draws and 1 loss in 10) you said 'Those four wins I thought he was lucky'.
Any chance that you can provide a detailed analysis on the 18 Dyche games? In particular, might you offer some insight as to whether or not Lady Luck was out and about at the time.
Wow, "even for you" hahaWhat an utterly ridiculous moronic post, even for you.
Wow, "even for you" haha
Go back to the hole you were in when Moyes proved Your Gaffer was inept within 3 games mate.
Yes because DCL was a massive success under dyche. And Branthwaite is a defender mateGood players are never irrelevant. You didn’t see the difference when Branthwaite was in the team to when Keane was. You didn’t see the complete drop off in legs in midfield when Onana left and Iroegbunam just chased the ball leaving huge holes. You don’t see the difference between a fully fit Calvert Lewin and Maupay upfront?
‘Good players are irrelevant’ , heard it all now, anything to have a pop at Dyche.
Yes because DCL was a massive success under dyche. And Branthwaite is a defender mate
Try harder
Moyes referenced all the good work Dyche had done. Do you actually read or notice anything in the real world or do you just vomit out whatever crybot AI headquarters feeds you?
When’s he next on talkSPORT, hope you’ve downloaded the AppScrabbling around with irrelevant illogical semantics as usual. Good to nothing has changed.
When’s he next on talkSPORT, hope you’ve downloaded the App