Search results for query: *

I see four people have voted for RONDON. Genuinely hope all their upcoming cataract operations go smoothly....

...I'm not forgetting it Dave, but I'm not basing an entire argument for his ability around it either. Because you can't. It's all in the numbers Dave, which - as is known - can't really be argued with can they? He refuses to adapt his 'stamp' which, frankly, simply smacks of ego now. Why...

Dave?

...it's the ROBERTO fluff all over again.

Is there anything he does that's good or works in any way? I'm struggling with that TBH...

Rather think you're missing the point there m'friend...ermmm, not suggesting it would be acceptable am I...I AM suggesting that I can't see anything changing at this moment under SILVA, more than happy to be proven wrong like....;)

Of course not Dave...he's doing brilliantly by making the same arse-up's here - with a budget - that he's made at his other two prem clubs. When does that become worrying mate? 12th, 13th...a 6-0 loss to city. When?

Y'know what, Gawwwd dammmits, you're absolutely right mate...but we don't do that do we...no way...frowned upon that kinda thing, it's Geordie/Kopite behaviour innit, and it's not the Everton way...:rolleyes: *No idea what the Everton way is anymore. :blush: Anyway, I genuinely don't think...

To a point, yes, agreed....the atmos at the ground is sometimes rotten, and I DEFINITELY think some of us need to have a big think into what our expectations are, in short; we're not as big as some portray us to be. But SILVA, it seems, follows a method that simply doesn't work. Like Roberto to...

Right at this moment I hate the club. It's crap. You can have all that '...y'gotta keep supportin' them though' fluff all day long, fact is nothing's changing...HE'S not changing. We've got the staff there (top striker aside like) but we're awful, like watching a Sunday bevvy-team that meets in...

Crap window this. Was really hoping for Charlie Austin.:confused:

Is he better than what we have? Yes. If we can get him should we? Yes. What's there to think about if it's a possibility? Or we aiming at Charlie Austin? We've had NIASSE in the squad FFS...and we're dismissing BATHSHOOOEY from the off. Sound. Weird us...

No. No it wouldn't... Based on this alone yes, get him....this is a good euro house compilation filllllum and that's all that should be required to YES this transfer. It's better than DCL's anyway.

...in what respect do you mean mate? To move people on? Hmmmm, no....because no matter how 'deep' MB's role is I doubt he'll be in any position at all to move on a player if the manager - as it were - 'fancies' them.

I've been very, vewwwwwwy MEH about the whole appointment... However, I think I'm coming round a bit, mainly based on the fact he seems keen to be here (because there's little else to base it on)...and the sooner someone is in the chair the better. Seems a lot of positives mooted from players...

He's a maverick, he suffer's no fools....and he won't answer to 'the man', no way... And if he doesn't want to wear a certain suit then - DAMN - he won't wear that suit. He also has nice hair. This is the better part of his CV.

How terribly underwhelming an appointment though... Oh well. On we go.

....if it's he then I shall support him. But there'll be no zeal to it because I just don't digs him. I wish - the Goat, I do - I wish I felt differently abarrrr him but it's all just a bit Pfffffttttt....the most interesting thing is the sacking for the 'non-conformist club-clubber incident'...

The 'RATE SAM' poll was a genius thing by the club, very, very clever because when SILVA dips a la ROBERTO and possesion has been shat on by goals against & another rellygayshon flirt the board will say '...but look, you wibblers, you wanted Sam out...we wanted stability, we asked you...we...

Hiya...what are we actually basing him being a 'good' manager on?