Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

27 years campaign

For or against


  • Total voters
    520
Status
Not open for further replies.
There’s definitely some real confusion at play here.

The only thing that’s clear is that we haven’t won a trophy in 27 years.

But the reasons we didn’t compete under Kenwright for all those years are completely different to the reasons we don’t compete under Moshiri.

There’s some common terrain there, but there is a confusing blurriness to the whole thing. Much like the club itself.
Precisely.

It's too cumbersome. You cant rally around a manifesto that concerns itself with all the ills of the past.

The problem is that the only thing that works: "Moshiri Out!" is unpalatable for a few reasons. (Kenwright and the others are irrelevant onlookers.)

It's the only solution but the stadium issue compromises it.
 

Precisely.

It's too cumbersome. You cant rally around a manifesto that concerns itself with all the ills of the past.

The problem is that the only thing that works: "Moshiri Out!" is unpalatable for a few reasons. (Kenwright and the others are irrelevant onlookers.)

It's the only solution but the stadium issue compromises it.
Yes. The immediate focus ought to be on pressuring Moshiri and the board to make the most sensible decisions they can about the next manager and ongoing football structure.

This is literally an existential crisis. The trophies can wait.
 
Pointless campaign unless you're going to call out the main and when it comes down to it issue and that's Moshiri. If you don't have the guts to call out the cause of the problem, hiding behind blaming Bill or managers or agents will only get you so far.

This campaign will go nowhere and fizzle out because of cowards.
 

I am all for the 27 Campaign. Clubs should listen to it's fanbase.

I think they are trying to open communication with the club but they aren't going to allow anyone else control it.

I wasn't a fan of the walk out because I felt it looked to the outside looking in as a negative effect especially to fans who don't want to support this or know about this like the media.

The sit in was fair better because it never "effect" the football which meant it was seen as far more positive.

The campaign needs to be more organised and better prepared which will make it more inclusive to all fans and allow a positive engagement to the board.

For example, if they gathered at the Liver Building and did a walk up to the ground via Bramley Moore for the FA Cup, you would see a bigger and better response from fans, the media and the club.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top