4-4-2

[HalewoodB]

i cant recall exactly, but how did chelsea setup with gullit in the ranks?

how do you define success?

how common was 451 ten years ago? twenty years ago?...etc

Winning things, no-one has won anything in england playing 3 at the back

 

[SuitsBlue]

how did 'total football' work out for the dutch?

 

[HalewoodB]

how did 'total football' work out for the dutch?

Note the England bit i put in every post

 

[SuitsBlue]

note the swede and the italian managers in the england job of late.

 

[HalewoodB]

note the swede and the italian managers in the england job of late.

Note they dont use 3 at the back either!!

 

[SuitsBlue]

not yet.

 

[HalewoodB]

not yet.

Not ever

 

[TheDevils2001]

We needed more of our creative player playing, so when Pienaar and Arteta comes back it would be more effective that formation, wish Moyes would try Yaks and Vaughan up front in the 2nd legs.

 

[SuitsBlue]

Not ever

how did mcclaren setup in croatia?

 

[monty]

We needed more of our creative player playing, so when Pienaar and Arteta comes back it would be more effective that formation, wish Moyes would try Yaks and Vaughan up front in the 2nd legs.

I would as well, we could afford to experiment a bit, let the side be more adventurous, no one is suggesting do 3 5 2 for good, of course not but why not give it a try when you can. If it isn't working Plan B can be utilised with a nod of the head or a substitution depending who is on the park I'm certain that this formation would be the last thing Brann would be expecting

 

[HalewoodB]

how did mcclaren setup in croatia?