6 + 2 Point Deductions

[Tel001]

Id be surprised if we get the huge fee some think though, he is hugely underwhelming at times, has so much potential and you just want him to grab control of games but he never does.

Isn’t Connor Gallagher rumoured to be moving for 80m ?

We won’t lose money on him because of his age and I think we would probably get 50m if he doesn’t push for a move .

 

[Simon Buttle]

Isn’t Connor Gallagher rumoured to be moving for 80m ?

We won’t lose money on him because of his age and I think we would probably get 50m if he doesn’t push for a move .

Yeah I don't see that somehow and if Spurs pay that then they are just stupid tbh. I think £50-60m is a decent price mate but I've seen some on here talking about much bigger numbers which I just think is unrealistic imo.

 

[ForeverEverton]

 

[DuncansPigeons]

Interesting on the BBC article from Dan Roan, the PL refused to comment on the parliamentary committee. Yet a source called it “political showboating”

This is starting to work and it needs to be rammed home. We need to keep up the protests and get whatever media we can

 

[Jim Kirk]

All I’m reading into that is that spurs have a chairman that knows what he’s doing and we don’t

I think a lot of this basically boils down to this point. Same rules for all clubs, but some have navigated them well and others made a right mess of it.

 

[Neiler]

Interesting on the BBC article from Dan Roan, the PL refused to comment on the parliamentary committee. Yet a source called it “political showboating”

This is starting to work and it needs to be rammed home. We need to keep up the protests and get whatever media we can

PL spin machine, its a dirty game.

 

[Shevin Keedy]

Nobody is buying anyone at this point. Will most likely happen in the summer

It won't happen at all, because again, nobody will pay that for him.

 

[MikeH72]

Isn’t Connor Gallagher rumoured to be moving for 80m ?

We won’t lose money on him because of his age and I think we would probably get 50m if he doesn’t push for a move .

Haha wow what, no

 

[Tipp blue]

Didn't other clubs take out Govt. loans though? Spurs, for example, borrowed 175m from the govt, to ease the impact of Covid.

We never. Once again, an overlooked fact.

And Arsenal... https://www.arsenal.com/news/club-receive-bank-england-covid-loan

 

[Stefc]

To sum up. £19.5m overspend is over 3 years remember. £6.5m per season, buttons! Yes we signed up to a rule but you can’t punish someone like that when there’s no guidelines for breaking it. It should just be a negotiated fine. It’s a small administrative breach. Like shutting down a business for filing their tax return late. Any points deduction at all is disproportionate. These laws are about to change and football governance is about to change. How this punishment could possibly be upheld is incomprehensible.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Interesting on the BBC article from Dan Roan, the PL refused to comment on the parliamentary committee. Yet a source called it “political showboating”

This is starting to work and it needs to be rammed home. We need to keep up the protests and get whatever media we can

Are they really going to pick a big fight with politicians at this precise moment? I’d be furious at someone briefing that, it really won’t help them.

 

[Neiler]

Are they really going to pick a big fight with politicians at this precise moment? I’d be furious at someone briefing that, it really won’t help them.

 

[Billy Dean]

Yeah this is the type of stuff that does my head in. Ignoring that we broke the rules by 19.5M. To simply say they are wrong we are right isn’t good enough.

Everton admitted guilt but to a lower amount. Even at the lower amount we still overspent and still broke the rules. I can’t just turn up for work at 2pm when everyone else is in at 9am. It’s the rules. If I break them, I will be punished.

The whole funding the stadium thing I appreciate but what people don’t know/don’t understand is that Moshiri didn’t use the funding for the stadium, he used it for the running of the business and paid for the stadium costs out of his own pocket, their argument is that you cannot claim the interest for the loans when you didn’t use them loans for what you say.

If I take a loan out to pay for a car, but then use it on my house, I can’t then say well I don’t want to pay the interest because I didn’t use it for what I originally intended.

I think the argument is if we were not building a stadium those loans would not have been needed in the first place.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

The remarkable thing about them taking on the politicians is that the PL might be the only organisation the public trusts less than parliament itself.

 

[Tel001]

Haha wow what, no

Only in the bbc gossip column .. think it was spurs that are “ preparing” a bid