Toffeeslam
Player Valuation: £35m
Honestly none of these lads know anything, it'll get leaked to Ornstein and his mates the night before.
Nobody really knows yet to be honest
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly none of these lads know anything, it'll get leaked to Ornstein and his mates the night before.
Hard to see that vote being passed by 14 teamsLeague will eventually get cut to fewer teams to make room for this super league can see it now , think more and more people have now woken up to just how much money greed etc has ruined the footy , took me long enough
Anyone who says they know is lyingsome whispers saying it’s not going to be good news on the appeal for Everton.
Really hope it’s not true as the sources are from a garbage football website
The 65 millions comes probably from what they are allowed as loses because of the 2 seasons in the championship instead of the 105 millions for premier league clubs (3 seasons), Forest can only have 61 millions...the fact that they have spent in both summer and January would suggest to me that they are not that far over even though I am aware that Johnson sale was pure profit.Tbf, the only rumour I had heard, was that it was at £65m over. But that in itself only goes to show one thing, nobody knows anything.
That will be bypassed in time , they’ll end up being a system where ever present or pl winners vote counts for moreHard to see that vote being passed by 14 teams
Ten teams the obvious 6 and whoever else is owned by some state , doubt attendees would drop much as even liverpool dead rubber UEFA cup games get decent crowds , plus the millions and millions worldwide who have subscribed to their epl tv season ticket will more than make up for any lost revenueThis is obviously the end game. We're just the first on the block. Fewer league games to allow for a much expanded European competition, either a super league or a revamped Champion's League. By 2035 it'll be a 16 team league.
The league cup will be binned off as well.
Has got it before anyone that rat ornsteinNobody really knows yet to be honest
Thought was 35 mill over is a bigger breach than usThe 65 millions comes probably from what they are allowed as loses because of the 2 seasons in the championship instead of the 105 millions for premier league clubs (3 seasons), Forest can only have 61 millions...the fact that they have spent in both summer and January would suggest to me that they are not that far over even though I am aware that Johnson sale was pure profit.
More to the point, will he be allowed to break the news if that news was positive for us and negative for the league.Wonder when ornstein is going to break the verdict
He's supposedly already told them it's not for him.
I may be wrong but aren't forest offering proof that they had more than one interested party for Johnson? Whereas aren't we saying it was spurs and spurs alone for Richarlison?
I love a fight but I'm concerned here about the strategy. We're a basket case of a club in how we're run and I've no confidence the club could manage a strategy to attack a closed shop clique of 20 clubs where what at a guess the majority are up the creek without a paddle without PL cash so won't rock the boat?
I hear Richard masters has that arrangement with Kyle walker.Ther
There are many that have said "would accept 6/8/10" search the thread.
It's like they love being cuckolded
Hope that is the case honestly i have no idea what way this case will go, i am still shocked by the punishment first time around. I am still confused if the league has put in place a punishment for the second case and if we get a good appeal, then it voids the other one. Forest should get a bigger deduction but i am still afraid if we get anotherMore to the point, will he be allowed to break the news if that news was positive for us and negative for the league.
I was told they want Southgate in the summer.
I think if it was their intention to sort 22/23's PSR by selling Johnson, and they decided to play the "we waited for the best price" card then playing him in three games in 23/24 before selling was pretty stupid. It might be a small sporting advantage (they won one of the games) but it still somewhat invalidates any attempt to backdate the sale.But Johnson could have done his ACL in the games he played for Forest.
Then what is their plan?
It doesn't matter how many parties were interested and what evidence they can provide they chose to sell him after the deadline knowing they were in breach.
But Johnson could have done his ACL in the games he played for Forest.
Then what is their plan?