14 current pl clubs and anyone relegated from the Pl within fbd past 3 years i reckon.So how many more teams are going to get caught up in this ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
14 current pl clubs and anyone relegated from the Pl within fbd past 3 years i reckon.So how many more teams are going to get caught up in this ?
But the submission of accounts is a requirement only during the next season, when they aren't a PL club any more. If they don't have to comply with that rule, then how to you get the evidence to charge the 3 year breach? It's a loophole and doesn't change the fact they should have complied with the PL rules during the three seasons in question, but it MIGHT work.
This is it in a nutshell, unfortunately.Until there's enough to say "ok, we hear you" for the rules to change to sweep Chelsea and Man City under the carpet.
As I said it was their right to plead “ not guilty” but the £17.4 million re stadium loans even if allowed would still have meant that the £105 million had been exceeded.Everton did not admit a charge because they genuinely felt they were compliant based on interpretation of the Stadium loans and interest and was not related to “playing for time”.
Until there's enough to say "ok, we hear you" for the rules to change to sweep Chelsea and Man City under the carpet.
But this is the beauty of their argument. Yes, the 22/23 accounts fall into PL jurisdiction. But the rule requiring the submission of the previous year's accounts no longer applies to them as they aren't a PL club in 23/24. So even if the PL suspect, or even know, they've breached in 22/23, they can't compel them to submit the accounts that prove it.They took PL money, for being in the PL 22/23, so there accounts should fall into that jurisdiction for that period too.
The outcome is if you are relegated you don’t have to adhere to any rule.
But this is the beauty of their argument. Yes, the 22/23 accounts fall into PL jurisdiction. But the rule requiring the submission of the previous year's accounts no longer applies to them as they aren't a PL club in 23/24. So even if the PL suspect, or even know, they've breached in 22/23, they can't compel them to submit the accounts that prove it.
I have no idea if that defence will even work and I guess the PL have nuclear options like simply not admitting them, but it's a fun all-or-nothing argument if Leicester decide to go with it.
It's almost as if rules from ten years ago have completely failed to adjust to massively changing economic circumstances in the football and non-football world and the ever-rising cost of even trying to keep yourself afloat in the Premier League.
Can’t see it ending well mate and eventually they will have to concede, as you say, they can block entry to the league or charge them on promotion when they are a PL club.
If they are seeing as being difficult it won’t end well for them at the commission.
They won’t get a way with claiming to be either an EFL club PL club, I won’t be surprised to see them charged by both.